Abstract:The discursive model of pre-translation analysis of international legal discourse relies on interrelated modules: the document conceptual space, with the harmonized value opposition between the concepts of "legal justice" and "compensatory justice", "common good" and "sovereignty"; the discourse addresser / addressee, embodied in the metonymic nomination "parties of the document"; the translator as an intermediate system, the semiospheres; extra-textual internalized realities. "Unifying" modules include semiospheres of international universal and basic branch documents, as well as universal human values and a shared internalized reality. The shared values underpin basic discursive strategies of consensus, solidarity, cooperation, marked by explicit and implicit intertextual means and additional strategies for minimizing imposition and hiding differences, implemented with tactics of generalization, mitigation and declarativeness based on passivation, nominalization, "marked theme", etc. Separating modules include semiospheres of the parties national legislations, marked by "without prejudice" clauses, metonymic nominations of "sovereign power", hedges scaling down the directive modality and idiomatic references to "public safety", etc.; semiospheres of recursive and procursive international branch texts that could be interpreted as conflicting with the document and are involved by 'non-affection' clauses and constative speech acts to fix the supremacy of one document over another. The document conceptual space may reflect the diverging interests and values of the parties, derived from implicit opposition between "legal justice" and "compensatory justice", harmonized by the documents. The markers of the "separating" modules are aimed at a combined strategy for predicting variable interpretation of particular norms with an indication of its source and normative harmonization. Keywords: International Legal Discourse, Model of Pre-Translation Analysis, Unifying and Separating Semiospheres, Value Opposition, Discourse-Forming Values.

Context Analysis of the "value Substance, Devalue Procedure" Thesis: on the Problem of Procedural Justice Incidentally

On the Basic Philosophy of Criminal Reconciliation——Comparative Study between Zhejiang "Fengqiao Experience" and U.S. VOR Model

Preamble of Applied Legal Philosophy: Its Attribute and Methods

What is the Key to “new Proceduralism”? Legal Procedure As the Space of Appearance Chinese Full Text

Problems with the Theory of Anti-Value Acts: Including A Discussion with Professor Zhou Guangquan

A Discursive Analytical Path of Appellate Court Opinions: Evaluation of Ideological Positioning in Bush V. Gore 2000

The Dialectical and Materialistic Understanding of Legal Values within the Framework of the Socio-Axiological Approach to Law and the Conventional Discourse Legal Theory

Study on the Essence of Litigation——The Internal Logic from Searching Fact to Realizing Procedural Justice

Value Judgment and the Knowledge Transformation of Chinese Criminal Jurisprudence

The Principle of Integrating Subjectivity and Objectivity:Examination from both Deontology and Methodology

Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices: Quantitative Thematic Analysis of Multiple Opinions of “bush V. Gore 2000”

A Critique of "Act-No-Value" Doctrine

On the Positive Analysis of the Justice

Value Judgments in Criminal Law Interpretation

The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain

On the Conceptual Structure of the Legal System:From the Perspective of the Jurisprudence of Value

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Procedural Sanction System

The Criminal Composition: Value Conflict and System Construction

Pragma-Dialectics: from a Perspective of Critical Thinking

Further Discussion the Quality and Quantity in Law

Pre-translation Analysis of International Legal Discourse: From Social Semiotics to the Concepts of Lotman and Bakhtin