Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

What is the Key to “new Proceduralism”? Legal Procedure As the Space of Appearance Chinese Full Text

Neoproceduralism and Its Discontents in China

Politicised Legal Discourse And Judicial Accommodation Of Petitioners In Chinese Courts

On the Constitution Normative Foundation of the Legitimacy of Administrative Procedure

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

New Procuratorial Role in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

On the Protection of Procedural Interests

Procedure and Formalization of Law

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

On Procedural Defense

On Proceduralized Constitution

Context Analysis of the "value Substance, Devalue Procedure" Thesis: on the Problem of Procedural Justice Incidentally

Modern Law in the Shifting Paradigms

Constructivism of Civil Procedure with Argumentation on Proceedings and Trials: And Advice on Revision and Promotion of Civil Procedural Law

Significance of the Procedural Rules in Modern Antitrust Law

The Democratic Limitation and Procedural Justice of Public Hearing

Procedural Justice and Narrow Instrumentalism

Rethinking and Restructuring Non-Litigation Procedure

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases