Experimental study of surgery-guided radiofrequency ablation for renal tumors at original position in vivo
LUO Dao-sheng,MI Qi-wu,MENG Xiang-jun,GAO Yong,DAI Yu-ping,DENG Chun-hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2013.08.029
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the efficiency,safety and technical parameter of radiofrequency ablation ( RFA) for renal tumors. Methods Thirty patients who suffered single renal tumor and underwent radical tumor nephrectomy were divided to three groups according to the tumor diameter ( φmax) and whether the renal artery was blocked or not before RFA: Group A ( φmax≤4. 0 cm) ,10 cases including A1 ( the renal artery was blocked before RFA) 5 cases and A2 ( the renal artery was not blocked before RFA) 5 cases. Group B ( 4. 0 cm < φmax < 6. 0 cm) , 10 cases including B1( the renal artery was blocked before RFA) 5 cases and B2 ( the renal artery was not blocked before RFA) 5 cases. Group C ( φmax≥6. 0 cm) ,10 cases including C1 ( the renal artery was blocked before RFA) 5 cases and C2 ( the renal artery was not blocked before RFA) 5 cases. Renal tumors were received single RFA ( frequency 450 kHz) after the tumors and renal pedicle blood vessel were exposed by the open or laparoscopic surgery. And then the tumor tissue was examined by pathological histologic analysis after radical resection of these tumors. Moreover,the relationship between pathological examination and tumor diameter ,melting time and whether the renal artery was blocked or not before RFA was analyzed. Results All 30 cases were renal cell carcinoma including 25 cases clear cell carcinoma and 5 cases collecting duct carcinoma. The melting time of Group A was 10 min and the ablation diameter of A1 was ( 5. 2 ± 0. 5) cm,A2 was ( 4. 5 ± 0. 6) cm ( A1 vs. A2,P = 0. 035) . And the melting time of Group B was 12 min and the ablation diameter of B1 was ( 5. 4 ± 0. 4) cm,B2 was ( 4. 6 ± 0. 5) cm ( B1 vs. B2,P = 0. 028) . Furthermore,the melting time of Group C was 15 min and the ablation diameter of C1 was ( 5. 5 ± 0. 6) cm,C2 was ( 4. 8 ± 0. 8) cm ( C1 vs. C2,P = 0. 038) . There was no significant difference among the average ablation diameter of Group A,B,C which was ( 5. 0 ± 0. 6) cm,( 5. 1 ± 0. 1) cm,and ( 5. 1 ± 0. 4) cm separately ( P > 0. 05) . Conclusions The RFA was safe and effective for the selective renal carcinoma patients and the effect was related to the tumor diameter. RFA could achieve sufficient ablation diameter which was larger than the tumor diameter in the small renal carcinoma ( φmax≤4. 0 cm) and get the cure effects. However,single RFA couldn't cure the large renal carcinoma ( φmax≥4. 0 cm) . Larger ablation diameter would be obtained when the renal artery was blocked prior to RFA. But no more ablation diameter could be generated by simple extension of ablation time when already melted 10 min.