Comparison of Coronary Angiography Via Radial with 5F Universal Catheter and Femoral Artery with Judkins Catheter

ZHANG Xiao-juan,ZHANG Chun-sheng,QU Hai-yan,ZOU Xue-yan,CAO Xiao-qing,QIAO Shu-bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-266x.2007.07.004
2007-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To compare the advantage and disadvantage of coronary angiography via radial with 5F universal catheter and femoral artery with Judkins catheter.[Methods] Four hundred and twenty six cases of suspected coronary artery disease were randomized into groups by the artery approaches,radial(218 cases) and femoral(208 cases).Success rate,operation time,X-ray irradiation time,hospitalized day after operation and complications were observed.[Results] There was no significant difference in success rate of puncture between two groups(P0.05).The average X-ray irradiation time,operation time and hospitalized time after operation in radial group was(4.68±3.53) min,(18.84±12.35) min and(1.73±1.07) d respectively,in femoral group(5.98±4.12) min,(25.96±10.66) min and(3.92±2.14) d.This difference was significant(P0.05). Occurrence rates of local hematoma and retention of urine were significant difference between two groups(P0.01).[Conclusion] Coronary angiography via radial with 5F universal catheter has the advantage of rapid hemostasis,less complications and high success rate,and can also reduce X-ray irradiation time,pain of patient and hospitalized time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?