Safety of multifunction 5F Tiger Ⅰ catheter in coronary angiography via right radial artery

Zhu Zhong-sheng,Chen Shao-liang,Ye Fei,Zhang Jun-jie,Lin Song,Tian Nai-liang,Kan Jing,Liu Ling-ling,Duan Bao-xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.09.043
2008-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To assess the feasibility and safety of multifunction catheter of 5F Tiger Ⅰ in coronary angiography versus Judkins approach via the right radial artery. METHODS: ①200 patients were selected from Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from April to October 2007, including 123 males and 77 females, aged (58±8) years. They were randomized into two groups (n = 100). The informed consent was obtained from all subjects. ②All patients underwent coronary angiography via the right radial artery using standard Judkins catheters (Cordis Corporation, Miami, U.S.) and 5F Tiger Ⅰ catheters (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). 6F Judkins L (JL) 3.5 and Judkins R (JR) 3.5 were used as first choice catheters in one group, if catheter tip size was not suitable, 6F JL4.0, JR4.0 and other catheters might be used. 5F Tiger Ⅰ catheter were used in the other group. If the left or right coronary artery angiography failed or did not achieve the target site, Tiger Ⅰcatheter intubation failed and replaced by Judkins or other catheters. ③Success rate of left and right coronary artery angiography, total procedure time, total fluoroscopic time, usage amount of contrast, incidence of complication correlating with catheter in angiography procedure, and cost of catheter were observed. RESULTS: ①The success rate of Tiger Ⅰ catheter in left and right coronary artery angiographies via the right radial artery was 94%, and that of Judkins catheter was 100% (P < 0.05). ②Total procedure time was (318.3±47.9) seconds in Judkins catheter group and (318.5±49.0) seconds in Tiger Ⅰ catheter group (P > 0.05). ③Total fluoroscopic time was (1.8±0.9) minutes in Judkins catheter group and (1.9±0.6) minutes in Tiger Ⅰ catheter group (P > 0.05). ④Usage amount of contrast was (42.6±6.4) mL in Judkins catheter group and (34.2±5.0) mL in Tiger Ⅰ catheter group (P < 0.05). ⑤ Incidence of complication correlating with catheter in angiography procedure was zero in both two groups. ⑥Judkins catheters cost (530.4±51.2) yuan, and Tiger Ⅰ catheter cost (260±0) yuan. ⑦Biocompatibility of material and host: No platelet disorder, local inflammation or general malaise were found in any patients undergoing coronary artery angiography by Tiger Ⅰ and Judkins catheters. CONCLUSION: Tiger Ⅰ catheter is feasible and safe in coronary angiography via the right radial artery with no specific biocompatibility problems. Judkins catheter is better than Tiger Ⅰ catheter in the success rate of coronary angiographies, but Tiger Ⅰ catheter is superior to Judkins catheter in reducing usage amount of contrast and cost of catheters.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?