A Discussion of the Theory on Five Types of Social Formations——A Critical Review of the Paper Questioning the Major Evidence of "Five Types of Social Formations"

XI Zhao-yong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-2826.2006.02.004
2006-01-01
Abstract:This paper holds a different idea from the one expressed in Questioning the Major Evidence of "Five Types of Social,Formations" by Professor Duan Zhongqiao.The author points out that Duan's paper regarded Grundrisse as the basis of "The Preface".This showed that Duan actually failed to make a distinction between Grundrisse and the officially published A Contribution to the Critique Political Economy(Book I).Moreover,Duan's interpretation of some arguments in Grundrisse is also questionable.Therefore,Duan's refutation of "five types of social formations" is not well justified.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?