Abstract:Abstract There are three overlapping objectives in the article. The first objective is to present three different Marxist perspectives, while focusing on the interpretation of the base/superstructure dialectic which is the key to the understanding of Marxian political economy. The second objective is to make sense of the first and second “Cold Wars” based on the different interpretations of the base/superstructure dialectic. The last objective is to reassert the materialist essence of the base/superstructure dialectic by evoking Marx and his concepts of “Labor” and “Capital”. The three different perspectives are analyzed based on this reassertion. Through these three objectives, two deductions were made: the first deduction is that scientific Marxism requires the acknowledgement of the overdetermination of the economic base (its dominance in the last instance) in the analysis of abstractions, empirical and historical data. The “totality of the relations of production” within the economic base appears abstract in nature, but it represents the ontological category of “Labor” that defines human history since its beginning. It has a transhistorical essence. Human beings work together to produce their basic needs, according to historically specific (abstract) relations of production. The superstructure determines the specificity of the relations of production; it defines the “historical” side of the relations of production in the economic base. In the era of capitalism, “Capital” (the private appropriation of social wealth) is the dominant relation that comes to dictate the “totality of the relations of the production” within the economic base, through the superstructure. Total capital is then the real “subject” of history, and all abstractions gain purpose and practicality based on the class struggle between Labor and Capital. The second deduction relates to real history explained on the basis of the first deduction. Looking at the historical development of the class struggle against monopoly-finance capital (the centralized and concentrated capital) in the 20th century, the First Cold War never truly ended even though the global socialist ideology became weak and the ideological struggle against the imperialist superstructure watered down.

A Discussion On Question of Sources and Component Parts of Marxism

Western Marxism's Theoretical Nature and Its Implications for China

Some Issues in Study of "Analytical Marxism"

Three Modes of Interpreting Marxism——Chinese Theorists' Studies on Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844 and Our New Viewpoints

Marxist State Theory in a Globalized Age

Historical Materialism in the Critique of Political Economy

Three Problems in Studies of Marx's Philosophy——Answer to Prof.Duan Zhongqiao

Three Questions about the Study of Marxist Philosophy

Mapping Western Marxism: On Zhang Yi-bing’s Deep Plough of Texts

Basic Framework of Marxist Principles as a Whole

The Status Quo,Frontier and Futurity of Marxism Philosophy Research——A Limited Description of Marxism Philosophy Research in Last Three Years

On the Historic Destiny of Marxism Historiography in China

The “Sinification” of Marxism: rudiments, a historical parenthesis and a “new round” of development in modern China

Marxism Is in Essence a Philosophy: The Inspiration of Karl Korsch's Marxism and Philosophy

Critique of Metaphysics, Capital Logic and Totality, and Social Critique Theory: the Three Critical Dimensions of Marx’s Philosophy

Theory: the Three Critical Dimensions of Marx's Philosophy

Uphold Marxism in a Multi-polar and Multivariate World Pattern

On the Academic Research of Marxism Study

Historical Materialism as a Philosophical Theory and As a Theory of Social History

The Four Basic Issues and Chinese Marxist Theory System

Comparing the Two “Cold Wars” Through Gramsci, Althusser and Mao