Abstract:Background: Non-invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure-strain loops (PSLs), which are generated by combining LV longitudinal strain with brachial artery blood pressure, provide a novel method of quantifying global and segmental myocardial work (MW) indices with potential advantages over conventional echocardiographic strain data, which suffers from being load-dependent. This method has been recently introduced in echocardiographic software, enhancing the efficiency of MW calculations. This study aimed to evaluate the role of non-invasive MW indices derived from LV PSLs in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. Methods: A total of 106 heart failure (HF) patients scheduled for CRT were included in the MW analysis. Global and segmental (septal and lateral at the mid-ventricular level) MW indices were assessed before CRT and at a 6-month follow-up. Response to CRT was defined as >= 15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume and >= 1 NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. Results: CRT response was observed in 78 (74%) patients. At baseline, the global work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) were significantly higher in CRT responders than in non-responders (both P<0.05). Furthermore, responders exhibited significantly higher mid lateral MW and mid lateral constructive work (CW) (both P<0.001), but significantly lower mid septal MWI and mid septal myocardial work efficiency (MWE) than non-responders (all P<0.01). Baseline mid septal MWE (OR 0.975, 95% CI: 0.959-0.990, P=0.002) and mid lateral MWI (OR 1.003, 95% CI: 1.002-1.004, P 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CRT response in multivariate regression analysis. Mid septal MWE <= 42% combined with mid lateral MWI >= 740 mmHg% predicted CRT response, with an optimal sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 82% [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.830, P<0.001]. Conclusions: Assessment of MW indices before CRT could identify the marked imbalance in LV MW distribution and can be widely used as a reliable complementary tool for guiding patient selection for CRT in clinical practice.

Area of Left Ventricular Regional Conduction Delay and Preserved Myocardium Predict Responses to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Hemodynamic comparison of different multisites and multipoint pacing strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapies

Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: May We Predict the Long-Term Clinical Response?

Effect of Left Ventricular Endocardial Activation Pattern on Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

A New Integrated Approach to Improve Left Ventricular Electromechanical Activation During Right Ventricular Septal Pacing

Left ventricular electrical delay predicts volumetric response to leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Non-invasive three-dimensional electrical activation mapping to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: site of latest left ventricular activation relative to pacing site

The left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Changes of Repolarization Parameters after Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and the Association with Echocardiographic Response in Heart Failure Patients

CMR Feature Tracking-Based Left Atrial Mechanics Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Adverse Outcomes.

Acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac contractility modulation with cardiac resynchronization therapy system

Regional Left Ventricular Fiber Stress Analysis for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison with Biventricular Pacing.

Are left ventricular diastolic function and diastolic asynchrony important determinants of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

The Value of Non-Invasive Myocardial Work Indices Derived from Left Ventricular Pressure-Strain Loops in Predicting the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Abstract 3402: Improvement of Left Ventricular Regional Function and Reverse Remodeling in Heart Failure Patients Received Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy-A Comprehensive Assessment by Real-Time 3D Echocardiogram and Tissue Doppler Imaging

Determination of Optimal Left Ventricular Pacing Site for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Tissue Doppler Imaging