Differences Between Chinese and Western Social Psychological Behaviors:"Virtuous-Vicious Culture" Hypothesis

WANG Deng-feng,CUI Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9841.2008.01.001
2008-01-01
Abstract:The purpose of the paper is to reanalyze the nature of differences between Western and Chinese cultures and its corresponding differences of psychosocial behaviors in a new perspective of human nature assumption.The basic assumptions on human nature are discussed based on the biological aspect of genes as selfish,and human nature is quite different in Western and Chinese cultures,and the only difference between Chinese and Western cultures is the beginning of human nature assumption as virtuous or as vicious.In Chinese culture,the beginning of human nature assumption as virtuous made the Chinese great burden on "becoming a person",and the Chinese having had the innate anxiety on their behaviors,and pay much attention to the evaluation of the moral nature of behaviors for themselves and the others.In contrast,the beginning of human nature assumption as vicious let the Westerners a easy way to "being a person",as the vicious nature made them an innate easy-going and extrovert style of behaviors because of the closeness between human nature assumption and the biological basis of genes.So the Westerners could pay more attention to the objective aspects of behaviors for themselves and the others.Implications of this assumption on re-clarification of several important concepts about cultural differences,e.g.,individualism and collectivism,are also discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?