Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided versus non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods A total of 60 patients with DVT were analyzed retrospectively from August 2015 to April 2016 in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: ultrasound-guided CDT (Group A, 30 cases), and non-guided CDT (Group B, 30 cases). Success rate of puncture, length of operation, incidence rate of hematoma, pseudoaneurysms, and arteriovenous fistula at the puncture sites, circumferential diameter difference before and after thrombolysis, venous patency improvement rate, deep vein patency rates and occurrence rates of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in long term were evaluated in two groups. Results In group A: the average success rate of puncture was 1 time, average length of operation was (15.4±3.2) minutes, the incidence rate of hematoma at venipuncture sites was 3.33%. Neither pseudoaneurysm nor arteriovenous fistula occurred at the puncture sites. Circumferential diameter difference before and after thrombolysis was (49.47±2.484) mm, venous patency improvement rate of limb was (77.00±2.603)%. The long-term patency rate was 80.0% and the PTS occurrence rate was 10.0%. In group B, the average success rate of puncture was 5.9 times, average length of operation was (30.8±6.6) minutes, the incidence rate of hematoma at venipuncture sites of lower limb was 26.67%. Incidence of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula at the puncture sites was 6.67%. Circumferential diameter difference before and after thrombolysis was (28.40±2.856) mm, venous patency improvement rate of limb was (57.23±1.828)%. The long-term patency rate was 46.67% and the PTS occurrence rate was 36.67%. There were significant differences in success rate of puncture, length of opera-tion, incidence of arteriovenous fistula at the puncture sites, circumferential diameter change before and after thrombolysis, venous patency improvement rate, deep vein patency rates and occurrence rates of PTS in long term between two groups ( P<0 . 05 ) . Conclusion The therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided CDT is better than non-guided and it's worthy of clinical application.

The Relationship Between Therapeutic Effect and Time of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Comparison of clear effect and the complications, and short and mid-term effects between ultrasound-guided and non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity

Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity of the Effect and Safety Analysis in 116 Cases

[Advanced Treatment Time Improves Outcomes of Patients with Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Reperfusion Therapy].

Intra-arterial Contimuous Thrombolytic Therapy for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Application evaluation of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis

Timing of Iliac Vein Dilation Formation for Acute Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis Complicated with Cockett Syndrome and Its Effect on the Duration of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis

Outcome Comparisons of Anticoagulation, Systematic Thrombolysis and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

The Relationship between Efficacy of Thrombectomy and the Course of Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity

Catheter-directed Thrombolysis Compared with Anticoagulation Treatment for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis-Short and Mid-Term Result

Ultrasound-guided versus non-guided catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis

The etiology of hypertension in the metabolic syndrome part four: the systemic perspective--the role of the neuroendocrine and immune systems, and the challenge of integration.

Safety and Efficiency of Delayed Thrombolysis with Urokinase in the Treatment of Low Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Clinical experience of thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

Effect of the Timing of Iliac Vein Stent Implantation on Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Patients with Severe Iliac Vein Stenosis: a Retrospective Study

Efficacy of percutaneous mechanical thrombus removal in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

Application of inferior vena cava filter placement and catheter-guided thrombolysis in treatment of deep venous thrombosis in lower extremities

Analysis of Efficacy of Therapy in 165 Cases of Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Extremity

Long-term result of thrombectomy and thrombolysis for acute mixed deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity

Analysis of the Effect of Interventional Catheter Thrombolysis Combined with Anticoagulation in the Treatment of Postpartum Deep Venous Thrombosis

Comparison of Surgical Thrombectomy and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Low Extremity Caused by Cockett Syndrome