Abstract:Since the reform era began in China in 1978, there have been significant changes in the nature and incidence of disputes, conflicts and social disturbances, and the mechanisms for addressing them. As with economic and governance reforms, the government has adopted a pragmatic, problem-solving approach as it has attempted to meet the broad and at times conflicting goals of justice and efficiency while maintaining socio-political stability and rapid economic growth. The result has been continuous experimentation leading to the creation of new mechanisms, the reform of existing mechanisms, and the return to older mechanisms in some cases when newer ones proved disappointing. This is generally true across areas: commercial disputes, constitutional and administrative law, socio-economic issues (pension, welfare and medical claims, labor disputes, land takings and environmental issues), criminal law, and civil and political rights. However, reforms have been more active, progress has been more noticeable, and the path of reforms has been more consistent and direct in some areas than others. We begin with a brief overview of significant developments in the handling of commercial disputes, socio-economic claims and public law (administrative and constitutional law) disputes. Three general patterns stand out: first, the much better performance of institutions for handling disputes in urban areas compared to rural areas; second, the significantly greater progress in handling commercial law disputes compared to socio-economic claims; and third, the more advanced state of development of administrative law compared to constitutional law. We then summarize some of the key factors underlying these patterns and the dynamics of reform, providing an account of why the government has opted for a particular mix of mechanisms to handle a certain type of dispute at any given time, why that mix has changed over time, and why there has been more progress in some areas than other areas. We conclude with some thoughts on what can be expected in the future, and some policy recommendations to help overcome some of the existing problems.

Administrative Disposal to Environmental Disputes during the Process of Civil Justice Reform

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

Environmental Administrative Litigation and Elimination of Environmental Harm

On the Dilemma and Outlet of the Environmental Civil Litigation in China

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

The Implement of Administrative Contract in the Domain of Environmental Regulation

Dispute Resolution in China: Patterns, Causes and Prognosis

Analysis of Impact from Administrative Reconsideration on Administrative Litigation

On Enlargement of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Actions

Effective Connection between Criminal Law and Administrative Law Protection in Environmental Crimes

Breaking the Dilemma Between Litigation and Non-litigation

Types of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China and Exploration of New Frontiers

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

Administrative Litigation over International Trade Disputes in the Context of Mix of Laws

Studies on "administrative Double Disposal Action

On Administrative Litigation Of International Trade From Multiple Perspectives