MITIGATON OF DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT BETWEEN EARTH STRUCTURE AND ROAD ON SOFT CLAYS
SHEN Shui-long,SHI Ming-lei,DU Shou-ji,NORIHIKO Miura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.07.015
2005-01-01
Abstract:For low embankment road on soft subsoils,since the traffic loading is cyclically exerted on the soft subsoils,there always exists excess pore pressure at a certain depth in the soft subsoils. Therefore,settlement under the traffic load is continuously developed in the long term. However,the crossing structures such as bridge abutment and box culvert are generally supported by piles and small settlement will happen. Thus,large differential settlement between road and crossing earth structures may occur. The differential settlement will affect or even obstruct vehicle transportations. In order to reduce this differential settlement,many methods have been proposed to provide the transition zone between pile-supported structure and road. In Japan,conventionally,three repairing approaches have been used:(1) to overlay a new pavement on the existing pavement for some periods (overlay repairing);(2) to set a concrete cushion slab under pavement of transition zone;and (3) to cut the pile top and reconstruct the structure. These conventional methods are either not effective or not economic. The effective transition zone treatment is to use piled embankments,which may use different pile types,namely,timber piles, stone columns,sand compaction piles,lime columns,soil-cement columns,and driven or cased in-situ concrete piles. This paper introduces a repairing project of transition zone of a low embankment road on soft Ariake clay, Saga,Japan. In this project the soil-cement columns were used to improve the soft subsoil under the transition zone called column approach (CA) method. The design procedure and parameters are introduced briefly at first. Then,the field case is introduced in detail. The results from field monitoring show that when the differential settlement is over some value,overlay repairing is not economic and the approach cushion does not work well while CA method mitigates the differential settlement more effectively.