Evaluation of the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury and the graft stability after reconstruction by using KT1000/KT2000 arthrometer

Ma MC,Jiang Y
2007-01-01
Abstract:AIM: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is already developing, however the quantitative evaluation of ligament stability needs an effective method. This study is designed to explore the value of KT1000/KT2000 arthrometer in the diagnosis of ACL injury and its application to evaluate the graft of ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 80 cases with ACL complete injury underwent arthroscopic reconstruction in the Six People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University from January 2006 to January 2007. Informed consents were obtained from all the patients.①All the cases were tested by KT1000/KT2000 arthrometer before operation, and the results were compared with the clinical tests (drawer test, Lachman test, pivot test) and MRI to verify the sensitivity of this arthrometer.②After reconstruction, the KT1000/KT2000 arthrometer was also used to test the knee laxity at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and over 1 year. The results were evaluated by using the International Knee Documents Committee score: grade A: good; grade B: nearly normal; grade C: abnormal: grade D: severely abnormal. RESULTS: Eighty cases of ACL complete injury all entered the result analysis.①The accuracy of KT1000 arthrometer test was higher than that of drawer test and pivot test (P =0.001, 0.037), while no significant difference was found compared with Lachman test and MRI (P =0.807, 0.598).②Follow-ups: In 80 cases at 3 months, there were 68 cases of Grade A and 12 cases of Grade B; In 76 cases at 6 months, there were 55 cases of Grade A, 19 cases of Grade B, and 1 case of Grade C; and 70 cases at 1 year included 48 cases of Grade A, 20 cases of Grade B, and 2 cases of Grade C; 68 cases over 1 year included 42 cases of Grade A, 22 cases of Grade B, and 4 cases of Grade C. CONCLUSION: KT1000/KT2000 arthrometer, with its high sensitivity, can be used not only in the diagnosis of ACL injury, but also in the evaluation of the surgical result, providing a quantity basis for the graft stability after ACL reconstruction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?