Intracardiac Echocardiography Evaluation in Secundum Atrial Septal Defect Transcatheter Closure.

Mario Zanchetta,Luigi Pedon,Gianluca Rigatelli,Antonio Carrozza,Marco Zennaro,Roberta Di Martino,Eustaquio Onorato,Pietro Maiolino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-002-1928-7
2003-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: This study was designed toassess the balloon sizing maneuvers and deployment of an AmplatzerSeptal Occluder (ASO). In addition, intraprocedural balloon sizing wascompared with off-line intracardiac echocardiographic measurements. Methods: The intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)measurements were: maximum transverse and longitudinal atrial septaldefect (ASD) diameters in the aortic valve and four-chamber planes;area of the ASD and its equivalent circle diameter. Thirteenconsecutive patients underwent transcatheter implantation of an ASOdevice using ICE guidance under local anesthesia. The device matchingthe balloon sizing diameter of the defect was implanted. QualitativeICE assessment of the ASO devices implanted was performed off line. Results: The mean equivalent circle diameter predicted byICE was 24.40 ± 5.61 mm and was significantly higher(p = 0.027) than the ASD measured by balloonsizing (21.38 ± 5.28 mm). Unlike previous studies we did not findany correlation between the two measurements (correlationcoefficient = 0.47). Only four of the 13 patients had optimaldevice positioning as shown by the qualitative ICE evaluation, whereasthe remaining nine patients had inadequate device placement. Thisresulted in a waist diameter that was an average 26.1% undersized inseven patients and 12.7% oversized in two patients. Five of the sevenpatients with an undersized device had ASO-atrial septum misalignmentwith leftward device deviation. Conclusion: The ICEimages allowed careful measurement of the dimensions of the ASD andaccurately displayed the spatial relations of the ASO astride the ASD.Moreover, use of the ICE measurement led to selection of a differentsize of device in comparison with those of balloon sizing. The clinicalbenefit of this new approach needs to be rigorously tested.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?