Abstract:Environmental impact assessment (EIA) system has been established in China since 1973. In present EIA cases, there are four participants in general: governments, enterprises, EIA organizations and the public. The public has held responsible for both social costs and social duties. The public supervises social costs produced by enterprises discharging pollutant in EIA. However public participation is mostly deputized by governments, which severely weaken the independence of the public as one participant in EIA. In this paper, EIA refers to the different attitudes of the participants whose optional strategies may be described by a proper game model. According to disfigurements in EIA, three sides (governments, enterprises, and EIA organizations) dynamic iterative game theory, dynamic game theory of incomplete information, and perfect Bayesian equilibrium theory to analyze the reciprocity relation among governments, EIA organizations and enterprises. The results show that in a short period, economic benefit is preponderant over social benefit. Governments and enterprises both do not want to take EIA to reveal social costs. EIA organizations’ income comes from enterprises and the collusions are built between them to vindicate economic benefit. In a long run, social benefit loss caused by environmental pollution must be recuperated sooner or later and environmental deterioration will influence the achievements of economic benefit, so both governments and enterprises are certain to pursue high social benefit and willing to take EIA, helpful to increase private benefit. EIA organizations will make fair assessment when their economic benefit are ensured. At present, the public as silent victims can not take actual part in EIA. The EIA system must be improved to break the present equilibrium of three sides, bringing the public to the equilibrium to exert public supervision.

Status Quo of Environmental Impact Assessment Teaching and Improvement

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Review on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning in China

The development of ecological impact assessment in China

Discussion on the Construction of Case Base of Environmental Impact Assessment Course Teaching

Constructing a Paradigm of Environmental Impact Assessment under the New Era of Ecological Civilization in China

Application of Project Teaching Method Reform in the Reformation for Practice Teaching of Environmental Impact Assessment

Studies on Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness

The Status Quo and Prospect of Social Impact Assessment in China

A Review of Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment

Environmental Economic Impact Assessment in China: Problems and Prospects

Problems and counter measures of some standards in environmental impact assessment

Progress in Practice and Theoretic Research of Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-up

Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect

The Contribution and Progress of Environmental Impact Assessment in Environmental Protection in China

Key steps in environmental impact assessment: a comparative study of China, Queensland State of Australia and Nepal

Game Theoretic Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment System in China

Sustainability-oriented Technical Standard System for Strategic Environmental Assessment:An analysis of the Effectiveness of the "Technical Guidelines for Plan EIA"

Planning Environmental Impact Assessment Law in China: Status Quo, Implementation Problems and Legislative Reform

Study on Environmental Impact Assessment of the Urban Master Planning in China

The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory