Abstract:Environmental impact assessment (EIA) system has been established in China since 1973. In present EIA cases, there are four participants in general: governments, enterprises, EIA organizations and the public. The public has held responsible for both social costs and social duties. The public supervises social costs produced by enterprises discharging pollutant in EIA. However public participation is mostly deputized by governments, which severely weaken the independence of the public as one participant in EIA. In this paper, EIA refers to the different attitudes of the participants whose optional strategies may be described by a proper game model. According to disfigurements in EIA, three sides (governments, enterprises, and EIA organizations) dynamic iterative game theory, dynamic game theory of incomplete information, and perfect Bayesian equilibrium theory to analyze the reciprocity relation among governments, EIA organizations and enterprises. The results show that in a short period, economic benefit is preponderant over social benefit. Governments and enterprises both do not want to take EIA to reveal social costs. EIA organizations’ income comes from enterprises and the collusions are built between them to vindicate economic benefit. In a long run, social benefit loss caused by environmental pollution must be recuperated sooner or later and environmental deterioration will influence the achievements of economic benefit, so both governments and enterprises are certain to pursue high social benefit and willing to take EIA, helpful to increase private benefit. EIA organizations will make fair assessment when their economic benefit are ensured. At present, the public as silent victims can not take actual part in EIA. The EIA system must be improved to break the present equilibrium of three sides, bringing the public to the equilibrium to exert public supervision.

The Contribution and Progress of Environmental Impact Assessment in Environmental Protection in China

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Establishment and Improvement of an Assessment and Accountability System for Eco-environmental Performance Evaluation

Environmental Economics: the Progress and Perspective in China

Research on the Construction of Integrated System Ofenvironmental Economic Accounting in China

UPDATED PROGRESS AND PERSPECTIVE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS IN CHINA

An Analysis on Statistical Indicators and Methodology of Environmental Investments in China

A Framework of Pollution-Based Environmental and Economic Accounting for China

Review on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning in China

Research on Environmental Assessment System of Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Three Levels

The development of ecological impact assessment in China

Study on Environmental Impact Assessment of the Urban Master Planning in China

Environmental Economic Impact Assessment in China: Problems and Prospects

Constructing a Paradigm of Environmental Impact Assessment under the New Era of Ecological Civilization in China

Framework and Operational Procedure for Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in China

The Status Quo and Prospect of Social Impact Assessment in China

Development and Practices of Strategic Environmental Assessment (sea) in China

The Progress and Prospect of Chinese Environmental Protection Industry

Game Theoretic Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment System in China

Comment on the System of Public Participation in EIA in China

Environmental Impact Assessment of General Land Use Planning Implementation from 1997 to 2010 in Jiangsu Province