Abstract:Since environmental impact assessment (EIA) regulations were adopted in China 30years ago, the implementation rate of EIA policies for development projects has been steadily increasing while national environmental quality keeps deteriorating. This contradiction prevents achievement of the goals that the regulations were originally created for, raising concerns regarding the EIA implementation process. One of the objectives of EIA is the evaluation of socio-economic costs introduced by various commercial activities. However, independent economic entities are inclined to break away from these cost related responsibilities, making it necessary for government agencies and EIA organizations to participate in the evaluation process. The practice of avoiding costs may also bring forth other issues, such as rent-seeking behavior and conspiracies. Reducing private costs and the tendency of the three EIA stakeholders to evade social responsibility are intertwined in every EIA process. Their activities are as follows: The government is the lawmaker whose attitude toward the EIA organization determines how business owners react in the EIA process. The government inclination can be interpreted as a signal from which enterprises can determine the nature of the government, which helps the enterprise owners formulate their future actions. A similar relationship also exists among the government, EIA organizations, and enterprise entities. Fundamentally, the correlations between the EIA stakeholders are determined by their socio-economic situation, namely, the economic costs and benefits they encounter. In this article, signaling game theory derived from the classic game theory is applied to describe the EIA process in China by analyzing the activities of the stakeholders and searching for game equilibrium solutions. The optimal reaction schema for stakeholders was obtained by transforming the equilibrium.

The Status Quo and Prospect of Social Impact Assessment in China

Review on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning in China

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

The development of ecological impact assessment in China

Constructing a Paradigm of Environmental Impact Assessment under the New Era of Ecological Civilization in China

Environmental Economic Impact Assessment in China: Problems and Prospects

Environmental Justice and Sustainability Impact Assessment: In Search of Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts Caused by Coal Mining in Inner Mongolia, China

Game Theoretic Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment System in China

Development of a Social Impact Assessment for the Water Environment: A Professional Perspective

The Contribution and Progress of Environmental Impact Assessment in Environmental Protection in China

Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the Countries along the Belt and Road Initiatives: System Effectiveness and the Compatibility with the Chinese EIA

Framework and Operational Procedure for Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in China

Public Participation Modes in China's Environmental Impact Assessment Process: an Analytical Framework Based on Participation Extent and Conflict Level

Planning Environmental Impact Assessment Law in China: Status Quo, Implementation Problems and Legislative Reform

Studies on Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness

Retrospect and Prospect of SEA in China:From Conception to Legislation

Revision of three-stakeholder signaling game for environmental impact assessment in China

Comment on the System of Public Participation in EIA in China

Integrated Evaluation of Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs in China: a Systematic Review

Study on Environmental Impact Assessment of the Urban Master Planning in China

Effectiveness and challenge of environmental impact assessment in industrial park, a case study in Northeast rust belt China