The Evaluation of Extramedullary Versus Intramedullary Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures with Osteoporosis

GUAN Hua-qing,YANG Hui-lin,XU Yao-zeng,YANG Tong-qi

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluated the extramedullary hip screw such as dynamic hip screw(DHS),and two kinds of intramedullary hip screws: proximal femoral nail-antirotation(PFN-α),Gamma 3 for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with osteoporosis.Methods Ninety-four osteoporotic cases with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur were treated.Twenty-one fractures were fixed with DHS(DHS group),and 53 were fixed with PFN-α(PFN-α group),and 20 were fixed with Gamma 3(Gamma 3 group).The data of each group were collected for statistical analysis including operating time,blood loss,intraoperative complications,drainage,clinical healing time of fracture,post-operative hip function and post-operative complications.Results There was no significant difference between PFN-α group and Gamma 3 group(P>0.05).But the difference in intraoperative complication,drainage,clinical healing time of fracture,post-operative hip function and post-operative complications between DHS group,PFN-α group,Gamma 3 group and that between PFN-α group and Gamma 3 group were of statistical significance(P<0.05).Comparing with DHS group,PFN-α group and Gamma 3 group it was found that there were less blood loss and drainage,shorter healing time,better post-operative hip function and less post-operative complications.And the difference of operating time and intraoperative complications among the three groups was of no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion The use of intra-medullary hip screws such as PFN-α and Gamma 3 in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with osteoporosis is more applicable than the extramedullary hip screw such as DHS.But during intramedullary operation,it should be cautious of the operating steps and defer the time of weigh bearing.