Proximal Femoral Nails Anti-rotation, Gamma Nails and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrohanteric Fractures of Femur in Adults:A Systematic Review
MA Kun-long,WANG Xuan,LUAN Fu-jun,LIANG Yu,ZHANG Ying-jie,FANG Yue,TU Chong-qi,YANG Tian-fu
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To access the efficacy and safety of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA),Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws(DHS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur in adults.Methods We searched the electronic database of Cochrane Library(Issue12,2011),PubMed(1966-2011.12),EMBASE(1974-2011.12),web of science(1958-2011.12),the Chinese Wanfang Literature Database(1992-2011.12),Weipu Information Network(1989-2011.12),China National Knowledge Infrastructure(1994-2011.12),the Chinese Biomedical Literature(19782011.12) to include randomized prospective studies on PFNA,DHS,and Gamma nails in treating intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.RevMan 5.1 was used for Meta-analysis,and the revised Jadad scale was used to access the quality of these studies.Results Twelve studies involving 1477 cases were included.The results of Meta-analysis showed that PFNA could shorten the operation time [MD= 32.19,95%CI(49.69,14.69),P=0.0003;MD= 4.52,95%CI(5.24,3.80),P < 0.000 01] and reduce the intraoperative blood loss [MD= 183.06,95%CI(277.37,88.74),P=0.0001;MD= 49.49,95%CI(84.15,14.83),P=0.005] compared with DHS and Gamma nail.But there was no statistical difference in the length of stay,total efficiency and postoperative complications among the three groups of patients.Besides,no statistical difference was found in all indicators between DHS group and the Gamma nail group.Conclusions Compared with DHS and Gamma nail,PFNA may shorten the operation time and reduce the intraoperative blood loss.However,PFNA does not improve overall efficiency,shorten the length of stay or reduce postoperative complications.In addition,there is no significant difference in treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures between DHS and Gamma nail.