Abstract:Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation for treating unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures (UIFF). Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical data of 86 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFF) treated in Hangzhou Fuyang Hospital of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2022 to December 2023 were collected and analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their treatment modality: the THA group (n=45, treated with THA) and the PFNA group (n=41, treated with PFNA internal fixation). The two groups were compared in terms of surgery-related indicators (operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency), postoperative recovery indicators (time to first ambulation, length of stay, time until full weight-bearing ambulation), and the incidence of postoperative complications. The pain indicators (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale) and hip joint function indicators (Harris Hip Scores) of patients in the two groups were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The hip joint function recovery outcomes of the two groups of patients were recorded at the last follow-up. Results: The PFNA group had significantly shorter operative time, shorter incision length, lower intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative drainage volume, and higher intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency compared to the THA group (all P < 0.05). The PFNA group also had significantly longer time to first ambulation, length of stay, and time until full weight-bearing ambulation (all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative Wong-Baker scores in both groups decreased compared to preoperative levels. At 1 and 3 months postoperatively, the PFNA group had significantly higher Wong-Baker scores than the THA group (P < 0.05), but at 6 months postoperatively, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Postoperative Harris scores increased in both groups compared to preoperative scores. At 1 month postoperatively, the PFNA group had significantly lower Harris scores than the THA group (P < 0.05); however, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the differences were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rates of excellent recovery of hip joint function between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both THA and PFNA internal fixation yield favorable outcomes in treating IFF with no significant difference in complications. The difference lies in the shorter operative time and lesser trauma inflicted by PFNA internal fixation, despite it involving prolonged radiation exposure and bed rest. Conversely, THA requires longer operative time and causes greater trauma but results in shorter postoperative recovery periods, allowing earlier ambulation.

An comparison of treatment effect of three internal fixation in intertrochanteric fractures

The Clinical Study of the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly with DHS, Gamma Nail and PFN

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures

Short-term efficacy of the proximal femoral nail antirotation systemversus intertrochanteric antegrade nail system in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture

Clinical outcome comparison of treating unstable intertrochanteric fracture by proximal femoral nail anti-rotation with dynamid hip screw and trochanter stabilizing plate

Compare the Clinical Effect Between DHS and PFNA on Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur

Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation and Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture: a Contrast Study

Efficiency of internal fixation on the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures

Internal Fixation Treatments for Intertrochanteric Fracture：A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Percutaneous Compression Plating and Short Reconstruction Nail for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture

Comparison of DHS and Gamma3 Nail in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw Internal Fixation on Serum Markers in Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures

Percutaneous Compression Plating Versus Short Reconstruction Nail for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

Efficacy analysis of artificial femoral head replacement and internal fixation with PFNA in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture

A Comparative Study of the Early Postoperative Outcome of Three Intramedullary Fixation Modalities in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur in the Elderly

Intramedullary fixation system in the treatment of elderly femoral intertrochanteric fractures

Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures

Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of PFNA versus DHS in treatment of osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures

Clinical outcomes of three treatments for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients