From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example
YE Liang-fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-055X.2011.05.006
2011-01-01
Abstract:The initial verdict of XU Ting case is a judgment of strict legalism.The reason that it evolves into a public event is the joint attacks of some lawyers,scholars and the public.The retrial verdict applies the special mitigation system which is stipulated in clause 63 of Criminal Law of China and reduces the initial sentence of life imprisonment to five years imprisonment,with the same facts and same crime which is affirmed in the initial verdict.Although the retrial verdict meets the expectations of the public,it has damaged judicial authority immeasurably.Besides,it shows the terrible consequence of untied discretion power.In fact,the crux of the case does not lie in judiciary,but in legislation.Therefore,the special mitigation system can not provide us a feasible scheme for solving the cases alike.Only by establishing regular constitutional review can we completely solve the problem of judicial injustice which derives form legislation injustice.