Abstract:China introduced civil and administrative public interest litigation (PIL) through a series of pilot projects and legislative revisions in recent years. Now a procuratorate has the standing to bring civil PIL cases against polluters and administrative PIL cases against administrative agencies in its jurisdictions while a qualified non-governmental organization (NGO) has no geographic limits and may bring civil PIL cases against polluters anywhere in mainland China. Previous literature focused on the use of PIL for redressing environmental damages in individual cases. This paper studies the function of PIL beyond individual cases with game theory. This paper uses data collected through autoethnography, interviews, databases of judgements, statistics, and previous literature. This paper finds that local procuratorates and NGOs brought a large number of environmental PIL cases and changed the behavior patterns of local governments and their environmental protection agencies as well as that of polluters. Before the introduction of PIL rules, governmental officers of local governments and their environmental protection agencies were more discretionary and selective in environmental law enforcement and were more cooperative with polluters. After the law introduced PIL rules, they are now less discretionary in environmental law enforcement, less cooperative with polluters, and more likely to strictly enforce the environmental law. This paper models the interaction between local governments and polluters before the introduction of environmental PIL as an infinitely repeated game and reveals the ensuing cooperation. This infinitely repeated game was broken by new players introduced by the PIL, i.e., the procuratorate, NGOs, and the court, which changed the behavior patterns of the local government and its environmental protection agencies as well as that of polluters. This paper concludes that the function of PIL beyond individual cases lies in that it breaks the chain of infinitely repeated game between the local government and polluters and thus changes their behavior patterns.

On Procuratorate's Prosecuting Environmental Public Interest Litigation:An Interpretation Based on the Plaintiff's Subject Qualification

Reflections on the Legislation for the Public Interest Litigation Filed by People’s Procuratorates in Article 55 of the Second Amendment to Civil Procedure Law of PRC

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

New Procuratorial Role in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation

Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation

Reflection on the People's Procuratorate Instituting Proceedings for the Public Good of Environment

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

On Theoretical Basis of Civil Public Prosecution

The Application Dilemma and Countermeasures in Confirming Illegal Judgments in Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation

Types of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China and Exploration of New Frontiers

Thought of the Improvement in China′s Environmental Public Interests Litigation System

The Environmental Litigation and the Qualification for the Proper Party

A conceptional game theory analysis of environmental public interest litigation of China

A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

On the Environmental Public Interest Litigation Mechanism for Public Participation

Clarifying the Subject of the Environmental Public Interest Lawsuit System

Evaluation on the Achievements of Environmental Public Interest Litigation against the Pollution in a Typical Lake in China

On Judicial Relief of Environmental Public Interest

The Expansion of Plaintiff's Standing in Environmental Public Interest Litigation

On the Sequence Design and Construction of the Subject of Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation

Principles of Environmental Public Welfare Litigation with Interlaced Interests---Focus on Environmental Civil Litigation of Public Welfare