Abstract:The significance of law enforcement cannot be understated in any state, and diverse models and traditions of law enforcement have evolved within different legal sustems. The status of the Procuracy in the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and modern Russia, has been consistently characterized by its own independent power for supervising legality, including the actions of government officials. This contrasts with the European and Anglo-American legal systems where the concept of “general supervision” is not present and prosecutors do not possess equivalent powers. In the socialist model of China, an independent system of supervisory bodies has been established separately from the procurator’s office to oversee the activities of government officials. Each model exhibits distinct ontological, structural and organizational features, and a comparative analysis of their accumulated experiences facilitates the identification of their respective advantages and disadvantages, underscoring the relevance of this study. The research aimes to identify and analyze the commonalities and differences among four organizational models for ensuring the rule of law. Notably, the empirical basis for comparing supervisory authorities emphasises the state superiority function, irrespective of the body responsible for its execution (functional approach), rather than external similarities such as the name "prosecutor's office" or "prosecutor". The study draws from authentic legal texts, regulations, authoritative doctrinal commentaries, relevant judicial practices, and official interpretations of foreign legislation. The outcomes of the research lead to informed conclusions regarding the distinctiveness of the Russian model of the Procuracy, which incorporates several advantages from each foreign model, complements them with its own features and is thus capable of embracing positive experiences, regardless of their origins, to effectively filfill its mission.

Comparative Study on the Objective Obligation of the Prosecutors

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

On Objective Responsibility of Prosecutors

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

Comparative Study on the Procuratorial Organs Positioning between Those Cross-strait

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

Chinese Procuratorate's Functions and Power Allocation in Civil Procedure

Discussion on the Dynamical Mechanism of Procurator Organs to Investigate the Crime

New Procuratorial Role in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

Chief Prosecutor System --another Commentary on Judicial Independence

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

The promotion of Objective punishment conditions—In the comparative way

On Civil Prosecutorial Suggestion

Supervisory bodies in the systems of power in Russia and certain foreign countries: Comparative analysis

On Prosecution's Benefit and Administrative Public Interest Litigation

On the Reform and Perfecting of Adjudication Supervision of People's Procuratorate

Comparison of the Principles of Prosecution and Prosecution Suspension between Germany and Japan

A Research on the Objective Distribution of Burden of Proof in Administrative Litigation