Abstract:Summary form only given. The evaluation of the performance of R&D in China began in the 1950s, and a number of relative theories, methods and tools have been developed in the past decades. Especially, the rising costs of R&D and the increasing dependence of companies on technology for competitive advantage are causing both external investors and managers to identify the outcomes of R&D activities. As a result, the evaluation and measurement on the R&D performance by which to check the productivity, impacts and efficiency of R&D activities has became more and more important since the 1990s. The R&D activities in China involve scientific explorations, programs and projects in firms, universities and public or private research organizations. The universities and research organizations of China play a more important role than firms in R&D, especially in the field of both basic science research and applied research. It is very important to evaluate the R&D performance of universities and research organizations in China. Many popular methods and tools, such as peer review, econometrics, scientometrics, AHP, integrated indicators, are widely used in the evaluation practice, notwithstanding their own problems or limitations. It is noticeable that the internal performance of organizations' R&D activities, such as papers published, designs produced, patents, as well as R&D/sales are paid more addition to, and more relative evaluation methods are developed and adopted, while the external impacts of R&D are comparatively ignored. Generally speaking, the current evaluation work has had less of an impact and role that they deserve. This article gives a systemic summary and analysis on the current evaluation theories and methods for R&D performance, and in the meanwhile, their limitations and drawbacks are also pointed out. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and importance of the R&D activities in the coming knowledge-based economy, some promising theories and approaches with high operability and practicability are introduced by which to evaluate the R&D performance effectively.

Basic Research is Overshadowed by Applied Research in China: a Policy Perspective

A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010

Comparative study on structural transformation of R&D funds in PR China and USA

S&T Policy Evolution: A Comparison Between the United States and China (1950-Present)

A bibliometric study of China's science and technology policies

Benzodiazepine effects on flicker sensitivity: Role of stimulus frequency and size

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

International Comparison on Connotation of Basic Research and Its Expenditure Statistics

Head in the clouds and feet on the ground: Research priority setting in China

Current and Future Challenges of the Chinese Research System

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Evaluating R&D Effectiveness: a Study on Chinese Practice and Trend

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

System Dynamic Modeling on the National Policy of Basic Research Input in China

Contradiction between input and output of Chinese scientific research: a multidimensional analysis

The Relationship among China'S Innovation Policies on Promoting High-Tech Trades by Developing S&T: A Historic Perspective

A quantitative study on the diffusion of public policy in china: evidence form the S&T finance sector

International Comparison on Structural Transformation of R&D Funds Source and Chinese Choice of Transformation

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science