Abstract:In view of the evolution of Chinese and U.S. American research policy in the past 60 years, the two countries have undergone different stages of development. The S&T policy system in the United States was gradually built up since World War II, the benefit of research freedom adding to academic interest. The intervention and support for science and technology from the government has been gradually strengthened, promoting S&T development. Since the 1990s, the U.S. government has defined the five functions of science as serving national objectives, emphasizing S&T progress to promote sustainable economic and social development, and continued innovation to maintain the U.S. American leadership position. Although the country has experienced a number of economic or financial crises, the U.S. government's investment in basic research has followed a course of rapid growth, treating basic research as a source of innovation and power. The Chinese S&T system was established upon and developed on a very weak basis after the establishment of the new Chinese republic. In the 1950s, the recovery and establishment of the S&T system almost fully emulated the Soviet model. Up to the late 1950s, With the successful implementation of the 12-year S&T development plan, the key tasks and key engineering projects drove the development of the basic disciplines and initially established the basic research system in China. The Cultural Revolution decade made Chinese S&T undertakings grind to a standstill, further widening the gap in relation to advanced global levels. With the reform and opening up in 1979, the Chinese S&T system was restored again. Especially since the 1990s, the state increasingly invested in basic research more and more significantly, and S&T development in China entered a fast track of development while basic research as the source of innovation received more attention from government and community.

A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010

A bibliometric study of China's science and technology policies

Bibliometrics Analysis Of Science And Technology Policy In China

The Impact of Technology Identification Policy on Firm Innovation: Evidence from China

China ’ s S & T and Innovation studies since 1978 : A meta-analysis based on bibliometrics

A quantitative study on the diffusion of public policy in china: evidence form the S&T finance sector

A quantitative study on the diffusion of public policy in China: evidence from the S&T finance sector

The evolution of Chinese technological and innovational policies and the empirical research on the performance(1978-2006)

The dynamics of the studies of China’s science, technology and innovation (STI): a bibliometric analysis of an emerging field

How Scientific Research Incorporates Policy: an Examination Using the Case of China's Science and Technology Evaluation System.

A retrospective analysis of China's science and technology evaluation policy since 1978

The science, technology and innovation policy studies in China: A scientometric analysis

S&T Policy Evolution: A Comparison Between the United States and China (1950-Present)

The Dynamics of Policy Coordination: the Case of China’s Science and Technology Policy-Making

The Relationship among China'S Innovation Policies on Promoting High-Tech Trades by Developing S&T: A Historic Perspective

China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory

A bibliometric study of China's international collaborative publications in nanotechnology

Statistical Analysis Of Historical Evolution Of Innovation Policies In China

Basic Research is Overshadowed by Applied Research in China: a Policy Perspective

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

China'S Patterns of International Technological Collaboration 1976-2010: A Patent Analysis Study