Abstract:Statement of problem: The light source stability of digital cameras and smartphones is important in shade matching in restorative and prosthetic dentistry to communicate objectively with the dental laboratory. Techniques that standardize the light source of such devices are lacking, and this limitation can lead to color mismatches, difficulties in color communication, and treatment documentation. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the magnitude of color difference (ΔE) among 3 shade selection methods during the fabrication of ceramic crowns: visual shade selection with a shade guide, digital shade selection with a digital camera and cross-polarizing filter, and digital shade selection with a smartphone and a light-correcting device. Material and methods: Forty-five patients in need of ceramic crowns were enrolled, and shade selection was evaluated according to different protocols: visual shade selection (A-D shade guide and IPS Natural Die Material Shade Guide, sent to the dental laboratory technician via a laboratory prescription); digital shade selection with a digital camera (D7000; Nikon Corp) with an 85-mm lens and wireless close-up flash, with and without a cross-polarizing filter (Polar eyes); and digital shade selection with a smartphone and a light-correcting device (iPhone XS attached to Smile Lite MDP, with and without its cross-polarizing filter accessory). Information from the smartphone was imported to an app (IPS e.max Shade Navigation App; Ivoclar AG) that converted the reading to a shade and level of translucency for the ceramic restoration. For all photographs, a gray reference card with known color values was positioned by the mandibular teeth and was used for white balancing of the digital photographs with a software program. All photographs were edited and sent to the dental laboratory: white-balanced with the shade guide; white-balanced with the substrate shade guide; black and white; saturated; and cross-polarized. Ceramic crowns were made with the same lithium disilicate material (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar AG) and cemented with the same resin cement (RelyX Ultimate Clicker, A3 shade; 3M). The ΔE values between the crown and the adjacent tooth were determined. The data were analyzed by using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests (α=.05). Results: The mean ΔE between a cemented ceramic crown and the adjacent tooth in the visual shade selection group was 5.32, significantly different than both digital camera (ΔE=2.75; P=.002) and smartphone (ΔE=2.34; P=.001), which were not different from each other (P=.857). Conclusions: The digital shade selection with photographs acquired with both a digital camera and a smartphone with a light-correcting device showed a threshold within the acceptable values (ΔE<3.7), whereas the visual shade selection showed an average ΔE above the threshold for acceptable values (ΔE>3.7). The use of a gray reference card helped standardize the white balance from the digital images.

Spectrometric analysis of color differences of ceramic and composite inlay

Spectrophotometric analysis of clinical factors related to the color of ceramic restorations: A pilot study

In Vitro Comparison of Optical Properties Between Single-Shade and Conventional Composite Resin Restorations

Marginal adaptation study of ceramic and composite inlay

Effects of different cavosurface margins on color matching of the resin composite

Comparison of shade matching accuracy by visual observation and Crystaleye spectrophotometer

[Influence of All-Ceramic and Porcelain-Fused-to-metal Restorations on Peri-Implant Gingival Discoloration:A Spectrophotometric Comparison].

Assessment of a prototype computer colour matching system to reproduce natural tooth colour on ceramic restorations

Evaluation of shade matching in the repair of indirect restorative materials with universal shade composites

Evaluation of color changes of discolored tooth after restored with E-max and IPS-EMPRESS Ⅱ ceramics

Visual evaluation of the color adjustment of single-shade and group shade resin composites in restorations with different cavity configurations

A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: Visual, digital camera, and smartphone

Difference in the color stability of direct and indirect resin composites

Evaluation of Color Matching Ability of a Single Shaded Resin Composite Versus a Single Translucency Resin Composite With Different Teeth Shades

Color Matching of a Single Shade Structurally Colored Universal Resin Composite with the Surrounding Hard Dental Tissues

Evaluating the Color Matching Ability of a Smart Chromatic Technology-Based Composite Resin for Premolar Teeth Restoration

The effect of ceramic thickness and resin cement shades on the color matching of ceramic veneers in discolored teeth

Photocolorimetry for full crown central incisor shade matching

Visibility of Recurrent Caries Through Universal Shade Resin Composite Restorations

Clinical Tooth Color Matching: In Vivo Comparisons of Digital Photocolorimetric and Spectrophotometric Analyses.

Color difference of composite resins after cementation with different shades of resin luting cement