Abstract:Purpose: To assess the effect of implant abutment material and soft tissue thickness on the peri-implant soft tissue color using spectrophotometry and to evaluate gingival esthetics and patient satisfaction with three different abutments. Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients with a missing maxillary tooth in the esthetic area received an endosseous implant using a two-stage protocol. Gray titanium, pink anodized titanium, and hybrid zirconia custom abutments were fabricated for each participant and inserted for one week with a cross-over design in a randomized manner. Color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer comparing midfacial peri-implant soft tissue and marginal gingiva of the contralateral tooth. CIE Lab color scale was used following the formula: ΔE = [(∆L)2 + (∆a)2 + (∆b)2 ]½ . PES scores were recorded, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed at each abutment change visit and at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman's test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction as well as the Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05). Results: Abutment material type significantly affected the ΔΕ values of the peri-implant mucosa when compared to the contralateral teeth. At baseline, the highest ΔΕ means ± standard deviation (SD) values were obtained with gray titanium (11.25 ± 2.98), followed by pink anodized titanium (9.90 ± 2.51), and zirconia abutments (6.46 ± 1.43). Differences were statistically significant irrespective of soft tissue thickness. The highest PES values were obtained with zirconia abutments (10.88 ± 0.88), followed by pink anodized titanium (10.12 ± 1.13) and the lowest with gray titanium (9.68 ± 1.41). PES differences were significant only for the thin soft tissue group. Regarding patient satisfaction, VAS scores for the pink anodized and zirconia hybrid abutment groups were higher than the gray titanium group for each question. Conclusion: The color difference between soft tissues around teeth and implants was significant in all groups regardless of tissue thickness. The hybrid zirconia abutments resulted in the least color difference, followed by pink anodized and gray titanium. Significantly different PES values were recorded only for the thin tissue group. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between zirconia and pink anodized abutments at the 1-year follow up. Pink anodized abutments represent a good esthetic alternative to zirconia hybrid abutments especially in mechanically challenging situations.

[Influence of All-Ceramic and Porcelain-Fused-to-metal Restorations on Peri-Implant Gingival Discoloration:A Spectrophotometric Comparison].

Changes of nickel and chromium contents in gingival tissue and gingival crevicular fluid after porcelain-fused-to-nichrome crown restoration

[Crown Color Match of Implant-Supported Zirconia and Porcelain-Fused-to-metal Restorations: a Spectrophotometric Comparison].

Influence of different abutment materials on the color of implant-supported restoration: A laboratory study

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Abutment Material on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color Measured Using Spectrophotometry

An Esthetic Evaluation of Different Abutment Materials in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Using a Crossover Design

Quantitative discoloration assessment of peri-implant soft tissue around zirconia and other abutments with different colours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comparison of technical, biological, and esthetic parameters of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Influence of anodized titanium abutments on the esthetics of the peri-implant soft tissue: A clinical study

Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis

Influence of Different Cements on the Color Outcomes of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate All-Ceramic Crowns and Peri-implant Soft Tissue.

[Experimental study on the transparency of different all-ceramic materials and their color changes under different backgrounds]

Effect of two kinds of porcelain fused to metal crowns on the level of aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase in gingival crevicular fluid

Spectrometric analysis of color differences of ceramic and composite inlay

Effects of Ni-Cr Based Porcelain-fused-metal (PFM) Crown on Gingival Health of the Restored Teeth

The influence of metal ceramic crown restoration on periodontal health of restored tooth

An Experimental Study on the Adaptation of Three Kinds of Porcelain Fused-to-metal Restorations

Effect of the metal ceramic restoration on detecting color using photoelectric colorimeter

INFLUENCE OF ABUTMENT MATERIAL, CEMENT THICKNESS, AND CROWN TYPE ON THE FINAL COLOR OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS

Spectrophotometric analysis of clinical factors related to the color of ceramic restorations: A pilot study

Comparison of the microecology and total protein of GCF between the teeth restored by Ni-Cr based porcelain-fused-metal crown and control teeth