INFLUENCE OF ABUTMENT MATERIAL, CEMENT THICKNESS, AND CROWN TYPE ON THE FINAL COLOR OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS

Hamiyet Kilinc,Fatma Ayse Sanal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8564
2024-09-27
Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the influence of abutment material, cement thickness, and crown type on the esthetics of implant supported restorations. Material and methods: In total, 60 specimens were prepared to represent six abutment groups: Group PA &#61; pink-anodized Ti; Group GA &#61; gold-anodized Ti; Group T &#61; nonanodized Ti; Group H &#61; hybrid (Ti &#43; zirconia); Group P &#61; PEEK (Ti &#43; PEEK); and Group C &#61; composite resin (control). Crown specimens (n &#61; 120) were obtained from Vita Enamic (VE) and Vita Suprinity (VS). Two cement thicknesses (0.1 and 0.2 mm) were used. The color values of crown configura:ons were measured and ΔE00* values were calculated. Statistical analyses included were Shapiro Wilk, three-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests (P ≤ .05). Results: Abutment (P < .001) and crown materials (P &#61; .001) had a significant effect on ΔE00* values, while cement thickness did not. Groups PA and H resulted in significantly lower mean ΔE00* values than other abutments, whereas Group T revealed the highest. Unlike VS, cement thicknesses created a significant difference on the ΔE00* values for VE (P ≤.05). Conclusions: Pink-anodized Ti or hybrid abutments for VE and pink- or goldanodized Ti for VS seem to be better options, in terms of color change. Cement thickness of 0.1 mm resulted in higher ΔE00* value than 0.2 mm for VE (P ≤ .05).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?