Abstract:Purpose Many factors can affect the aesthetics of dental restorations, including the instrumental techniques used in shade matching, and can lead to clinical failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using the cross‐polarization digital photograph technique and intraoral scanners for shade matching, and also evaluate the effect of the level of clinical experience on shade matching success. Materials and Methods Color analysis was performed on the maxillary right central incisors of 10 subject models with Vita Easyshade. Intraoral scanning was performed 10 times on each model using TRIOS 3 and color analysis was performed from the same spot. Then cross‐polarized and non‐polarized photographs of the models were taken with standard settings using a gray reference card. Each shade tab of the Vita System 3D‐Master scale was also photographed with two different polarization techniques. Four groups (n = 12), including prosthodontics faculty staff, postgraduate students in prosthodontics, undergraduate students, and dental technicians matched the shade tabs and the model photographs obtained with both techniques on a standardized computer screen. Finally, the color differences between the shade tabs and maxillary central incisors matched by observers from four different groups were recorded using a colorimeter, Classic Color Meter, in accordance with the CIELAB system and CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) values were calculated. The data were compared with the acceptability threshold of 1.80 for ΔE00. The data obtained from the observers were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 Release Notes program. Independent Samples t‐test was used to compare normally distributed data according to binary groups. The level of significance was 0.05. Results A statistically significant difference was found in the shade matching on photographs taken with different techniques in postgraduate students (p = 0.02). Also, there was a statistically significant difference in success between the groups that made shade matching based on photographs obtained with the non‐polarization technique (p = 0.00). The undergraduate students achieved statistically significantly lower results than all other groups (ΔE00 = 5.57 ± 1.07). The kappa value between the intraoral scanner and spectrophotometer results was 0.10, and this value was not statistically significant (p = 0.32). Conclusions The cross‐polarization technique used especially for shade matching is not superior to the non‐polarization technique. Academic and clinical experience might be correlated with shade‐matching success with the non‐polarization technique. The clinical acceptability threshold could not be achieved in the shade matchings made on digital photographs taken with both techniques. Shade matching performed with an intraoral scanner did not yield reliable results.

Mechanisms of murine spontaneous liver transplant tolerance.

In Vitro Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Digital Instruments

Factors affecting the delegation of tasks by the registered nurse to patient care assistants in acute care settings. A selective review of the literature.

Evaluation of the color reproducibility of all-ceramic restorations fabricated by the digital veneering method

Comparison of different digital shade selection methodologies in terms of accuracy

Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card

Comparison of in vivo visual, spectrophotometric and colorimetric shade determination of teeth and implant-supported crowns

Comparison of shade matching accuracy by visual observation and Crystaleye spectrophotometer

[Is the use of surgical microscope justified in thyroid surgery? 10-year experience with thyroid surgery performed by means of microsurgical technique].

Photocolorimetry for full crown central incisor shade matching

Effects of Surface Treatments and Abutment Shades on the Final Color of High-Translucency Self-Glazed Zirconia Crowns.

Effect of different instrumental techniques and clinical experience on shade matching

Esthetic Appearances of Anatomic Contour Zirconia Crowns Made by Additive Wet Deposition and Subtractive Dry Milling: A Self-Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Color Stability of Three Resin-Ceramic Materials Using a Spectrophotometer and a Digital Photography Software

Signaling repression of transcription by RNA polymerase III in yeast.

A Comparative Study to Check the Accuracy of Tooth Shade Selection With Standardized Digital Photographs and a Spectrophotometer

A modified maxillary mouthguard.

Quantitative Analysis of Color Accuracy and Bias in 4 Dental CAD-CAM Monolithic Restorative Materials with Different Thicknesses: an in Vitro Study.

A Clinician's Perspective on the Accuracy of the Shade Determination of Dental Ceramics—A Systematic Review

Effect of abutment shade, ceramic thickness, and coping type on the final shade of zirconia all-ceramic restorations: in vitro study of color masking ability

Influence of Different Cements on the Color Outcomes of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate All-Ceramic Crowns and Peri-implant Soft Tissue.