Comparison of surface roughness parameters Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz with different measuring devices
Martin Rosentritt,Sibylle Schneider-Feyrer,Laura Kurzendorfer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106349
Abstract:Objectives: The aim of this in-vitro study was to investigate the influence of the measuring devices (mechanical and optical) on the surface values Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz of different materials and machined surfaces. Material and methods: Mechanical (contact profilometry (CP): Perthometer S6P, Perthen Mahr, G) and optical (scanning electron microscope (SEM): Phenom, FEI, NL; confocal 3D laser scanning microscope (CLSM): VK-100, Keyence, J) measuring devices were used to determine the surface roughness Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz. Glass-ceramic (Empress, Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL), zirconia (Cercon HT, Dentsply, D), composite (Grandio, Voco, D), denture base material (Palapress, Kulzer, D) and titanium (grade 4) were investigated (n = 10 measurements) after surface finishing: sandblasting (Al2O3; 250 μm), diamond treatment (80 μm; wet), sandblasting (Al2O3; 50 μm), and polishing (grit of 4000; wet; Tegramin-25, Struers, D). Statistics: Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: Surface characteristics Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz, which were detected with mechanical and optical measuring devices on different materials and surface finishing, showed significant (p ≤ 0.001, ANOVA) differences. Significant (p ≤ 0.045, Bonferroni) differences between CP, SEM and CLSM (line; area) were found, mainly for Ra/Sa. Discussion: The surface roughness on different dental materials and differently machined surfaces were influenced by the individual mechanical and optical measuring devices. Optical methods measure a significantly higher roughness value for all materials and surface finishes.