Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Audit Quality Vs Signaling Effect

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

A Structuralist Analysis on the Determinants of Audit Market Structure

Impacts of Mechanism of Blockholders Counterbalance on the Effectiveness of Auditing Constraints

Investor Heterogeneity, Auditor Choice, and Information Signaling

Study on Economic Consequences of Deregulation in China's Audit Market: Evidence from B-share Audit Market

Auditor Choice and Its Implications for Group-Affiliated Firms

Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings

Does the Market Care Auditors' Reputation?——Evidence and implications from the case of"KeLong Electric"

Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China

How Big-4 Firms Improve Audit Quality

Auditor Career Concerns, Audit Fees and Audit Quality

Auditor Selection, Signal Transmission and Optimization of Capital Structure: an Empirical Research on the Listed Companies in China

Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

International expansion and audit opinion shopping: A signaling perspective

Multiple large shareholders and auditor choice: evidence from China

Auditor Rotation and Audit Quality:A Theoretical Analysis