Abstract:In China, ″typical classes″ refers to cases already happened and with special significance. ″Typical Cases″ issued by the Supreme Court can be divided into″Typical Cases of the Local Courts″ and ″Typical Cases of the Supreme Court″. The former is the judgment by the local courts, which are discussed by the sentence committee of the Supreme Court and published in The Supreme Court Gazette of the People’s Republic of China. The latter is the judgment of the Supreme Court published in The Supreme Court Gazette of the People’s Republic of China with a typical significance and guideline function. In fact, to assure that similar cases can be similarly dealt with, ″Typical Cases″ can be a reference and guideline for the local courts. To adopt the implementation of the ″Typical Cases″, it should properly expand the authorization scope of ″typical cases″, let the Superior Court undertook the function of authorizing ″typical cases″, and the Supreme Court only retains the register and review power. Administrative cases due to the application of local decrees, autonomous decrees and local government regulations should be reviewed by the Superior Courts. It should abrogate case instruction system, substituted with ″typical cases″ guidance system. It should incorporate the formula methodology of ″typical cases″, let the sentence committee of People Courts to authorize ″typical cases″, and publish it with serial numbers. It should also be applied to the ″typical cases″ published by the Superior Courts. From a comparative law viewpoint, case law cannot be the equivalence of ″typical cases″. China lacks the related survival environment for case law, but case law should be the direction of the future development of ″typical cases″.

Towards the Influence of Judicial System of Gaoli Upon the That of Tang Dynasty

On the Similarities and Differences between Tang Law and Roman Law in the Judicial System

"Typical Cases" As an Informal Legal Source in the Administrative Law

The system of selecting officers in Tang Dynasty and the materity of the ancient court verdict style

The Contrast between the Same System of Marriage in the Tang Dynasty and Japan

Criminal Judicial Bad Effect and Improvement Brought by Traditional Law Culture

Analysis on the Spirit of Ancient Chinese Judicial Rules

A Comparative Study of the Divorce Systems of the Tang Dynasty and Japan at the same Era

The Turning Point to Correctly Understand the Legal System in Tang Dynasty---A Debate over and Pertinent Opinions on the Assertion of“Four Criminal Codes”in the New Book of Tang

THE ORIGIN AND TRANSFORMATION OF JUDICIAL YUAN: FROM THE COMPARATIVE AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

On The"sansi" of the Tang Dynasty's Judicial System

On the Koryo Change of the Application of Penalties of Tang Code

A Comparative Study on Pre Qin's Patriarchal Clan system and Greek Polis Legal System

Attribution and Judicial Control in Chinese Court Judgments: a Corpus-Based Study

On ＂One System＂ of Chinese Courts：the History,Practice and Theory

The Research of China Ancient Times Judicial System Characteristic and Modern Model

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

On the Relation of the Law between China and Korea from the Han-four Counties to the Silla Dynasty

Official System,Language,and Judicature:Powers Moving from Manchu to Han Officials on the Board of Punishments in the Qing Dynasty

Authority of and Dissidence to Judicial Decision

Local Society,Ethical Traditions,Practice on the Rule of Law and Active Justice