"Typical Cases" As an Informal Legal Source in the Administrative Law
ZHANG Jian-sheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2007.03.019
2007-01-01
Abstract:In China, ″typical classes″ refers to cases already happened and with special significance. ″Typical Cases″ issued by the Supreme Court can be divided into″Typical Cases of the Local Courts″ and ″Typical Cases of the Supreme Court″. The former is the judgment by the local courts, which are discussed by the sentence committee of the Supreme Court and published in The Supreme Court Gazette of the People’s Republic of China. The latter is the judgment of the Supreme Court published in The Supreme Court Gazette of the People’s Republic of China with a typical significance and guideline function. In fact, to assure that similar cases can be similarly dealt with, ″Typical Cases″ can be a reference and guideline for the local courts. To adopt the implementation of the ″Typical Cases″, it should properly expand the authorization scope of ″typical cases″, let the Superior Court undertook the function of authorizing ″typical cases″, and the Supreme Court only retains the register and review power. Administrative cases due to the application of local decrees, autonomous decrees and local government regulations should be reviewed by the Superior Courts. It should abrogate case instruction system, substituted with ″typical cases″ guidance system. It should incorporate the formula methodology of ″typical cases″, let the sentence committee of People Courts to authorize ″typical cases″, and publish it with serial numbers. It should also be applied to the ″typical cases″ published by the Superior Courts. From a comparative law viewpoint, case law cannot be the equivalence of ″typical cases″. China lacks the related survival environment for case law, but case law should be the direction of the future development of ″typical cases″.