Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

On the Similarities and Differences between Tang Law and Roman Law in the Judicial System

The Contrast between the Same System of Marriage in the Tang Dynasty and Japan

On Differences and Similarities Between the Han and Tang Dynasties

Towards the Influence of Judicial System of Gaoli Upon the That of Tang Dynasty

Contributions of Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties to the Law in Tang Dynasty

A Comparative Study of the Divorce Systems of the Tang Dynasty and Japan at the same Era

Research on Similarities and Differences of Two Kinds of Rural Land Contracts

Research into Comparison Between Chinese and Western Legality Literatures

The Similarities and Differences of Economic Thought between Qin and Jin's Legalists and Qi's Legalists

The Roman Law Tradition and Its Future Development in China

Law and Punishment of Tang Dynasty

On the Relationship of Public Law and Private Law

The Turning Point to Correctly Understand the Legal System in Tang Dynasty---A Debate over and Pertinent Opinions on the Assertion of“Four Criminal Codes”in the New Book of Tang

System Design of Mixed Law:A Compromise Between "law" and "Judge"

Tang Code and the Prosperity of China′s Feudal Society

A Systemic Comparison of the Execution of the Law in the Two Great Legal Systems from the Perspective of Property Law

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

The difference of Chinese legalism and western legalism

The system of selecting officers in Tang Dynasty and the materity of the ancient court verdict style

The Judge and the Sacred: Notes for a Comparative History of Western and Chinese Judicial Cultures

Roman Law & Greek Spirit