Design of racetrack cavity beam position monitor*
Q. Luo,B. G. Sun,D. H. He
2010-01-01
Abstract:A new high brightness injector is planned to be installed at HLS of NSRL. It is based on a new photocathode RF electron gun. To steer the beam along the optimal trajectory, higher precision controlling of beam position is required. The positional resolution of the BPM system designed for the new RF gun should be higher than 10μm. A new cavity BPM design is then given instead of old stripline one because of its higher positional resolution. In a normal symmetrical pill-box BPM design, machining tolerance will result in x-y coupling, which will cause cross-talk problem. A novel design is then presented here. To solve the problem before, a position cavity which has a racetrack cross section is used instead of a pill-box one. The ideal resolution of this design could be less than 4 nm. INTRODUCTION The proposed high brightness injector at HLS is designed for the development of new technologies of the fourth-generation light source. The fourth-generation light sources have higher brightness, higher coherence and shorter optical pulse, so they require high quality electron bunch with high beam brightness, low emittance, low beam energy spread and high current . To develop high quality electron source, it is important to improve the performance of BPM system to steer the beam along the optimal trajectory. The 4~5 MeV RF photocathode gun of the new injector in HLS is designed to produce high brightness beam with the transverse normalize emittance of 6mm-mrad for a bunch charge of 0.3 nC. The positional resolution of BPM should be less than 10μm. To meet the demand NSRL decides to use cavity BPM instead of the stripline one [2] designed for HLS LINAC before. Cavity BPM promises much higher position resolution compared to other types of BPMs . There’s no restriction on polarization direction in a perfect symmetrical pill-box design, the signals coupled out from a pair of orthogonal coupling direction will be linear independent, which means a displacement can always be expressed as Cartesian coordinates at fixed directions. When there is a random distortion, the polarization direction is then restricted and there will be cross-talk problem when the coupling directions are not same as the polarization direction, which means a beam displacement at one direction will result in signals at both two direction. Since the distortions, which caused by fabrication, welding, etc., is unpredictable, it is impossible to couple out the signals in the same direction as the polarization . Therefore we use a new cavity which has predictable dissymmetry. This new cavity can be considered as a cylindrical cavity splitted and then connected by a small rectangular one. RACETRACK CAVITY BPM THEORY In the racetrack BPM design, as introduced before, a cylindrical cavity is splitted at y-direction and then connected by a rectangular cavity. Fig. 1 shows the simulation by Microwave Studio (MWS), rectangular cavities are considered as ideal waveguides. In this cavity the polarization direction can be considered as fixed and the frequencies of these two modes at fixed polarization direction are different, so the cross-talk is then minimized. Figure 1: 3D model of racetrack BPM in MWS. A displacement at x-direction results in a positional signal at a frequency higher than the frequency of positional signal excited by a y displacement. Fig. 2 shows the two polarization direction and how waveguides are used to couple out TM110 mode of the electromagnetic field excited by beam displacement. The monopole mode, which makes a significant contribution to inaccuracy of measurement, is also cut off . Figure 2: Two polarization direction of TM110 mode. Figures 3 and 4 have showed the dependence of the electrical field (normalized by MWS) of TM110 modes to beam displacement. When beam displacement is in the ___________________________________________ * Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (10875117) and the National “985 Project” (173123200402002) # luoqing@mail.ustc.edu.cn TH6REP058 Proceedings of PAC09, Vancouver, BC, Canada 4084 Instrumentation T03 Beam Diagnostics and Instrumentation range of ±10 mm, the electrical field can be considered as in direct proportion to beam displacement. Figure 3: Ez vs y coordinate, excited by y displacement. Figure 4: Ez vs x coordinate, excited by x displacement. In the linear range, the energy loss of beam satisfies: