The clinical value of lung ventilation/perfusion imaging successively in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

ZHANG Guo-xu,HAO Shan-hu,WANG Zhi-guo,GUO Jia,ZHANG Tong,ZHANG Wen-wen,CHEN Lan-lan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2011.23.009

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of lung ventilation/perfusion(V/Q) imaging successively in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism(PE).Methods 103 and 107 patients random selected with suspected PE underwent V/Q imaging in successive(the perfusion imaging was performed after the ventilation imaging immediately) and distance(the ventilation and perfusion imaging was performed independently in the morning and afternoon or during tow days immediately) method respectively.The differences in sensitivity and specificity were compared in the diagnosis of PE.Results The sensitivity and specificity were 96.70%,94.79%(P>0.05)with successive method and 75.00%,72.72%(P>0.05)with distance method.Conclusions There's no obvious difference in diagnosis of PE using successive and distance V/Q imaging.Advantage:The successive V/Q imaging could decurtate the visit time obviously,which is much more important for the diagnosis of acute PE.Shortage:The successive method requested major drug consumption.