Abstract:Background—In patients with severe heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) systolic function associated with LV reverse remodeling and favorable 1-year survival. However, it is unknown whether LV reverse remodeling translates into a better long-term prognosis and what extent of reverse remodeling is clinically relevant, which were investigated in this study. Methods and Results—Patients (n=141) with advanced heart failure (mean±SD age, 64±11 years; 73% men) who received CRT were followed up for a mean (±SD) of 695±491 days. The extent of reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 3 to 6 months relative to baseline was examined for its predictive value on long-term clinical outcome. The cutoff value for LV reverse remodeling in predicting mortality was derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve. Then the relation between potential predictors of mortality and heart failure hospitalizations were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, followed by Cox regression analysis. There were 22 (15.6%) deaths, mostly due to heart failure or sudden cardiac death. The receiver operating characteristic curve found that a reduction in LVESV of ≥9.5% had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 70% in predicting all-cause mortality and of 87% and 69%, respectively, for cardiovascular mortality. With this cutoff value, there were 87 (61.7%) responders to reverse remodeling. In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, responders had significantly lower all-cause morality (6.9% versus 30.6%, log-rank &khgr;2=13.26, P=0.0003), cardiovascular mortality (2.3% versus 24.1%, log-rank &khgr;2=17.1, P<0.0001), and heart failure events (11.5% versus 33.3%, log-rank &khgr;2=8.71, P=0.0032) than nonresponders. In the Cox regression analysis model, the change in LVESV was the single most important predictor of all-cause (&bgr;=1.048, 95% confidence interval=1.019 to 1.078, P=0.001) and cardiovascular (&bgr;=1.072, 95% confidence interval=1.033 to 1.112, P<0.001) mortality. Clinical parameters were unable to predict any outcome event. Conclusions—A reduction in LVESV of 10% signifies clinically relevant reverse remodeling, which is a strong predictor of lower long-term mortality and heart failure events. This study suggests that assessing volumetric changes after an intervention in patients with heart failure provides information predictive of natural history outcomes.

Incremental prognostic value of combining left ventricular lead position and systolic dyssynchrony in predicting long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Effect of left ventricular lead concordance to the delayed contraction segment on echocardiographic and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

A novel method combining gated SPECT and vectorcardiography to guide left ventricular lead placement to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A proof of concept study

Relationship between left ventricular lead pacing position and long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Very Long-Term Follow-Up in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Wider Paced QRS Equals Worse Prognosis

Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling but Not Clinical Improvement Predicts Long-Term Survival after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

GW28-e1234 Impact of Different Left Ventricular Pacing Sites on Clinical Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Impact of left ventricular lead position on clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Impact of right ventricular lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy

Effects of right ventricular lead location on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart failure patients …

Left atrial function and long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Impact of left ventricular lead position on echocardiographic response after upgrading from right to biventricular pacing - Insights from the BUDAPEST CRT Upgrade Trial

CMR Feature Tracking-Based Left Atrial Mechanics Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Adverse Outcomes.