Abstract:Modern concrete mix design is a complex process involving superplasticisers, fine powders, and fibres, requiring time and energy due to the high number of trial tests needed to achieve rheological properties in the fresh state. Concrete batching involves the extensive use of materials, time, and the testing of chemical admixtures, with various methodologies proposed. Therefore, in some instances, the required design properties (physical and mechanical) are not achieved, leading to the loss of resources. The concrete equivalent mortar (CEM) method was introduced to anticipate concrete behaviour at fresh and hardened states. Moreover, the CEM method saves time and costs by replacing coarse aggregates with an equivalent sand mass, resulting in an equivalent specific surface area at the mortar scale. This study aims to evaluate the performance of fibre in CEM and concrete and determine the relationships between the CEM and the concrete in fresh and hardened states. Steel and polypropylene fibres were used to design three series of mixtures (CEM and concrete): normal-strength concrete (NSC), high-strength concrete (HSC), high-strength concrete with fly ash (HSCFA), and equivalent normal-strength mortar (NSM), high-strength mortar (HSM), and high-strength mortar with fly ash (HSMFA). This study used three-point bending tests and digital image correlation to evaluate load and crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) curves. An analytical mode I crack propagation model was developed using a tri-linear stress–crack opening relationship. Post-cracking parameters were optimised using inverse analysis and compared to actual MC2010 characteristic values. The concrete slump is approximately half of the CEM flow; its compressive strength ranges between 78% and 82% of CEM strength, while its flexural strength is 60% of CEM strength. The post-cracking behaviour showed a significant difference attributed to the presence of aggregates in concrete. The fracture energy of concrete is 28.6% of the CEM fracture energy, while the critical crack opening of the concrete is 60% of that of the CEM.

Questions on Utilizing Method of Schmidt for Testing Strength of Concrete

Discussions on "views on some problems about the paper:questions on utilizing method of schmidt for testing strength of concrete"

Experimental research on the strength of concrete mearsured by limpet

Simple Three-Step Analytical Scheme for Prediction of Elastic Moduli of Hardened Cement Paste

Mechanical and Microstructure Characterization of Fresh High- and Normal- Strength Concrete with Non-Contact Electrical Resistivity Measurement

A two stage procedure for assessment of in situ concrete strength using combined non-destructive testing

Reliability of the tests’ results of Schmidt Hammer and core cutting for assessing actual compressive strength of concrete

Fracture Toughness And Microstructure Of Concrete At Early-Ages

In-situ strength testing of high strength concrete

Effectiveness of the Concrete Equivalent Mortar Method for the Prediction of Fresh and Hardened Properties of Concrete

STUDY ON GLUING-PULLING METHOD FOR CONCRETE STRENGTH TEST

Effecting Coefficients for Concrete Structure Durability Design Index

Rapid Field Evaluation of the Strength of Cement-Stabilized Clayey Soil

Characterization of surface hardness and microstructure of high performance concrete

Comparison of Evaluation Tests for Compressive Strength of Structural Concrete

Evaluation of the compressive strength of autoclaved aerated concrete in existing masonry

Shear Strength of Strain-Hardening Cementitious Materials

An Innovative Test Method for Tensile Strength of Concrete by Applying the Strut-and-Tie Methodology

Influence of Interfacial Parameters and Testing Methods on UHPC–NSC Bond Strength: Slant Shear Vs. Direct Tensile Testing

Strength Values of Cementitious Materials in Bending and Tension Test Methods

Brittle behavior of high strength concrete