The Reliability and Validity of the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-Chinese Version

吕颖,韩臣柏,王小平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.06.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Historic Clinical Risk management(HCR-CV) in Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia.Methods:The psychometric study included 156 schizophrenic inpatients recruited from Nanjing Brain Hospital, all subjects participated in the retest reliability assessment after 2weeks. Twelve schizophrenic inpatients participated in the inter-ratter reliability assessed by two psychiatrists.Results:The Cronbach's α coefficients of the HCR-CV ranged from 0.584~0.746; inter-rater consistency coefficients ranged from0.820~0.965; the test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.523~0.953; the correlation coefficient between item and factor ranged from 0.264~0.836; AUC of total scores and subscale scores ranged from 0.600~0.732, the AUC of total scores of HCR-CV was 0.721, cut-off was 21, and sensitivity and specificity were 60.00%, 77.30% respectively, correctly classification was 75.64%. AUC of historic subscale score was 0.732, cut-off was 10, and sensitivity and specificity were53.33%, 90.07% respectively, correctly classification was 86.54%. Criterion-related validity: The total score and subscale scores of HCR-CV were related with scores of MOAS and PCL-R significantly.Conclusion:The HCR-CV is an efficient and valid instrument for violence risk assessment in Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?