Abstract:Objective To translate the English version of Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI)into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SSCI in patients with stroke. Methods The Chinese version of SSCI was developed by translation,back translation combined with the review and cultural adjustment of panel of experts. From March to June 2016,we conducted a survey in 204 stroke patients recruited from 2 community health service centers by convenience sampling using questionnaires consisting of Demographic Questionnaire,Chinese version of SSCI,Chinese version of Self - rating Depression Scale (SDS),Chinese version of Barthel Index (BI),Chinese version of 12 - item Short Form Health Survey (SF - 12). Item analysis of the Chinese version of SSCI was performed with critical ratio method and Pearson correlation coefficient. Content validity and structural validity of the Chinese version of SSCI was assessed by content validity index (CVI), factor analysis,respectively. Construct validity of the Chinese version of SSCI was tested by correlations of Chinese version of SSCI scores with Chinese version of SDS,BI,SF - 12 scores. Cronbach′s α was applied to assess the test - retest reliability of the Chinese version of SSCI. Results Item analysis showed that the Chinese version of SSCI could discriminate the high - score group from the low - score group (P < 0. 01). The Chinese version of SSCI had linear positive correlation with self - stigma dimension (r = 0. 955,P < 0. 01 )and enacted stigma dimension (r = 0. 900,P < 0. 01)in scoring. Item - total correlations were linear and positive (r ranged from 0. 472 to 0. 806,P < 0. 01 ). Self - stigma dimension was linearly and positively correlated with each of its 13 items in scoring (r ranged from 0. 673 to 0. 807,P < 0. 01 ). Likewise,enacted stigma dimension was linearly and positively correlated with each of its 11 items in scoring (r ranged from 0. 519 to 0. 845,P < 0. 01 ). The I - CVI ranged from 0. 800 to 1. 000,and the S - CVI was 0. 932. From exploratory factor analysis,3 factors were generated,which explained 65. 586％ of the total variance. All the items had factor loadings ranged from 0. 463 to 0. 850 in their corresponding dimensions. The Chinese version of SSCI score demonstrated a linear and positive correlation with Chinese version of SDS score (r= 0. 609,P < 0. 01),whereas it was negatively and linearly correlated with Chinese version of BI score (r = - 0. 486,P <0. 01),score of mental component summary (MCS)and physical component summary (PCS),in Chinese version of SF - 12 (r = - 0. 524, - 0. 462,respectively,P < 0. 01). Internal consistency of Chinese version of SSCI was confirmed by Cronbach′s α of 0. 951,and the Cronbach′s α of self - stigma and enacted stigma were both 0. 927;the test - retest interclass correlation of total scale was 0. 881,and the test - retest interclass correlation of self - stigma and enacted stigma was 0. 927,0. 797 respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of SSCI showed good reliability and validity,and could be used in the research of stigma of neurological disorders in China.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure Ⅱ

An Investigation into the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III)

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Self-Report Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch Psychometric Analysis and Online Application

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Reliability Validity and Responsiveness of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure 4th Version in a Multicultural Setup.

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire for Discharged Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

A Multi-Center International Study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Version IV: Rasch Psychometric Validation

Validation Study of the Chinese Version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.

Reference Values and Cutoff Scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to Determine Independence for Wheelchair Users and Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

Reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale in patients with cerebellar injury

Cross-cultural and Psychometric Property Assessment of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale in Chinese Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Development of a valid Chinese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the functional status score for the ICU (FSS-ICU) after translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Validation of the Chinese version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Chinese self-intermittent catheterization quality of life scale among patients with neurogenic bladder

Development of the Chinese Version of Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness and Test of Its Reliability and Validity in Stroke Patients

Preliminary Validation Study of the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Scales for People with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.