Abstract:We propose simple nonlinear mathematical models for the legal concept of balancing of interests. Our aim is to bridge the gap between an abstract formalisation of a balancing decision while assuring consistency and ultimately legal certainty across cases. We focus on the conflict between the rights to privacy and to the protection of personal data in Art. 7 and Art. 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EUCh) against the right of access to information derived from Art. 11 EUCh. These competing rights are denoted by (i1) right to privacy and (i2) access to information; mathematically, their indices are respectively assigned by u1∈[0,1] and u2∈[0,1] subject to the constraint u1+u2=1. This constraint allows us to use one single index u to resolve the conflict through balancing. The outcome will be concluded by comparing the index u with a prior given threshold u0. For simplicity, we assume that the balancing depends on only selected legal criteria such as the social status of affected person, and the sphere from which the information originated, which are represented as inputs of the models, called legal parameters. Additionally, we take "time" into consideration as a legal criterion, building on the European Court of Justice's ruling on the right to be forgotten: by considering time as a legal parameter, we model how the outcome of the balancing changes over the passage of time. To catch the dependence of the outcome u by these criteria as legal parameters, data were created by a fully-qualified lawyer. By comparison to other approaches based on machine learning, especially neural networks, this approach requires significantly less data. This might come at the price of higher abstraction and simplification, but also provides for higher transparency and explainability. Two mathematical models for u, a time-independent model and a time-dependent model, are proposed, that are fitted by using the data. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10506-022-09338-3.

On the Mechanism of Balancing of Interest in Modern Legislation Process

The Analysis of the Circulation of the Operation Right to Contractual Land

Certain Problems on Legislation of Contractual Operation Right of Rural Land

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Balance and Imbalance in Human Rights Law

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

Boundary Line of Interests Balancing

Discrete Structure of Pricing Right and Its Balancing Logic

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

On the Legal Interests

A Study on the Joint Mechanism in the Scope of Civil Action and Non-litigation Procedures

The Division of the Legislative Power between the Central and Local Legislation

Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests

Construct modern Chinese Property Law under the Balance of Public Power and Private Right

Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

The Function and Procedure of the Civil Public Interests Litigation

Interest Coordination and Social Harmony

The Structure of Balance of Political Law——Rousseau's Constitutive Principles of Popular Sovereignty in Social Contract

Harmony of Interests on Condition of Interest Differentiation--A Perspective on "Represent the Basic Interests of the Overwhelming Majority of the People"