Abstract:Background Forkhead box, class O (FoxO) belongs to the large family of forkhead transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved forkhead box DNA-binding domain. To date, the FoxO group has four mammalian members: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, which are orthologs of DAF16, an insulin-responsive transcription factor involved in regulating longevity of worms and flies. The degree of homology between these four members is high, especially in the forkhead domain, which contains the DNA-binding interface. Yet, mouse FoxO knockouts have revealed that each FoxO gene has its unique role in the physiological process. Whether the functional divergences are primarily due to adaptive selection pressure or relaxed selective constraint remains an open question. As such, this study aims to address the evolutionary mode of FoxO, which may lead to the functional divergence. Results Sequence similarity searches have performed in genome and scaffold data to identify homologues of FoxO in vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis was used to characterize the family evolutionary history by identifying two duplications early in vertebrate evolution. To determine the mode of evolution in vertebrates, we performed a rigorous statistical analysis with FoxO gene sequences, including relative rate ratio tests, branch-specific d N / d S ratio tests, site-specific d N / d S ratio tests, branch-site d N / d S ratio tests and clade level amino acid conservation/variation patterns analysis. Our results suggest that FoxO is constrained by strong purifying selection except four sites in FoxO6, which have undergone positive Darwinian selection. The functional divergence in this family is best explained by either relaxed purifying selection or positive selection. Conclusion We present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the FoxO gene family and show that the genes have evolved through duplications followed by purifying selection except for four sites in FoxO6 fixed by positive selection lie mostly within the non-conserved optimal PKB motif in the C-terminal part. Relaxed selection may play important roles in the process of functional differentiation evolved through gene duplications as well.

FoxO1 and Its Effects on the Transformation of Muscle Fiber Type

Regulation of the FoxO transcriptional activity and the affection to meat quality

FoxO1 regulates muscle fiber-type specification and inhibits calcineurin signaling during C2C12 myoblast differentiation

Over-expression of FoxO1 Inhibits the Differentiation of Porcine Skeletal Muscle Myoblast

FoxO1 Suppresses Expression of MyHC Ⅰ in Yorkshine Porcine Skeletal Muscle

The Role of Forkhead Box Family in Bone Metabolism and Diseases

The Role and Molecular Mechanism of FoxO1 in Mediating Cardiac Hypertrophy

FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates

Advances in the Researches of the Biological Function of Transcription Factors FOXOs

FOXO Transcription Factors: Their Clinical Significance and Regulation.

FOXO1 Regulates Bovine Skeletal Muscle Cells Differentiation by Targeting MYH3.

Regulation of FoxOs Transcription Factors on Body Metabolism

Roles of MEF2A and HOXA5 in the Transcriptional Regulation of the Bovine Fox O1 Gene

Advances in the FoxO Class of Transcription Factors

The Roles of FoxO Transcription Factors in Regulation of Bone Cells Function

The Essential Role of FoxO1 in the Regulation of Macrophage Function

Foxk1 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Represses Myogenic Differentiation by Regulating Foxo4 and Mef2.

Research Progress on Forkhead Box Protein O1 and Bone Metabolism

Role and mechanism underlying FoxO6 in skeletal muscle in vitro and in vivo

Nuclear Transcription Factor Foxo1 and Glucose,lipid Metabolism

Tissue-Specific Metabolic Regulation of FOXO-Binding Protein: FOXO Does Not Act Alone