Abstract:Background Forkhead box, class O (FoxO) belongs to the large family of forkhead transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved forkhead box DNA-binding domain. To date, the FoxO group has four mammalian members: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, which are orthologs of DAF16, an insulin-responsive transcription factor involved in regulating longevity of worms and flies. The degree of homology between these four members is high, especially in the forkhead domain, which contains the DNA-binding interface. Yet, mouse FoxO knockouts have revealed that each FoxO gene has its unique role in the physiological process. Whether the functional divergences are primarily due to adaptive selection pressure or relaxed selective constraint remains an open question. As such, this study aims to address the evolutionary mode of FoxO, which may lead to the functional divergence. Results Sequence similarity searches have performed in genome and scaffold data to identify homologues of FoxO in vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis was used to characterize the family evolutionary history by identifying two duplications early in vertebrate evolution. To determine the mode of evolution in vertebrates, we performed a rigorous statistical analysis with FoxO gene sequences, including relative rate ratio tests, branch-specific d N / d S ratio tests, site-specific d N / d S ratio tests, branch-site d N / d S ratio tests and clade level amino acid conservation/variation patterns analysis. Our results suggest that FoxO is constrained by strong purifying selection except four sites in FoxO6, which have undergone positive Darwinian selection. The functional divergence in this family is best explained by either relaxed purifying selection or positive selection. Conclusion We present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the FoxO gene family and show that the genes have evolved through duplications followed by purifying selection except for four sites in FoxO6 fixed by positive selection lie mostly within the non-conserved optimal PKB motif in the C-terminal part. Relaxed selection may play important roles in the process of functional differentiation evolved through gene duplications as well.

The Role of Forkhead Box Family in Bone Metabolism and Diseases

The Roles of FoxO Transcription Factors in Regulation of Bone Cells Function

Role of forkhead box O1 in bone remodeling

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer.

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer

Research Progress on Forkhead Box Protein O1 and Bone Metabolism

FOXM1: Functional Roles of FOXM1 in Non-Malignant Diseases

Forkhead transcription factors in immunology

Forkhead box proteins: tuning forks for transcriptional harmony

Research Progress on the Role of FOXOs Family in Cancer

The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer

Toward a mechanistic understanding of DNA binding by forkhead transcription factors and its perturbation by pathogenic mutations

The Emerging Roles of Forkhead Box (FOX) Proteins in Osteosarcoma.

FOXO Transcription Factors: Their Clinical Significance and Regulation.

FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates

The forkhead transcription factors are important in regulating vascular pathology , diabetes and regulatory t cells

Advances in the Researches of the Biological Function of Transcription Factors FOXOs

Regulation of FoxOs Transcription Factors on Body Metabolism

Role of Forkhead Box Class O proteins in cancer progression and metastasis

Forkhead Box P1 (foxp1) in Osteoblasts Regulates Bone Mass Accrual and Adipose Tissue Energy Metabolism

Regulation of Forkhead Box C Genes on Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue Development