Abstract:Background Forkhead box, class O (FoxO) belongs to the large family of forkhead transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved forkhead box DNA-binding domain. To date, the FoxO group has four mammalian members: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, which are orthologs of DAF16, an insulin-responsive transcription factor involved in regulating longevity of worms and flies. The degree of homology between these four members is high, especially in the forkhead domain, which contains the DNA-binding interface. Yet, mouse FoxO knockouts have revealed that each FoxO gene has its unique role in the physiological process. Whether the functional divergences are primarily due to adaptive selection pressure or relaxed selective constraint remains an open question. As such, this study aims to address the evolutionary mode of FoxO, which may lead to the functional divergence. Results Sequence similarity searches have performed in genome and scaffold data to identify homologues of FoxO in vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis was used to characterize the family evolutionary history by identifying two duplications early in vertebrate evolution. To determine the mode of evolution in vertebrates, we performed a rigorous statistical analysis with FoxO gene sequences, including relative rate ratio tests, branch-specific d N / d S ratio tests, site-specific d N / d S ratio tests, branch-site d N / d S ratio tests and clade level amino acid conservation/variation patterns analysis. Our results suggest that FoxO is constrained by strong purifying selection except four sites in FoxO6, which have undergone positive Darwinian selection. The functional divergence in this family is best explained by either relaxed purifying selection or positive selection. Conclusion We present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the FoxO gene family and show that the genes have evolved through duplications followed by purifying selection except for four sites in FoxO6 fixed by positive selection lie mostly within the non-conserved optimal PKB motif in the C-terminal part. Relaxed selection may play important roles in the process of functional differentiation evolved through gene duplications as well.

Toward a mechanistic understanding of DNA binding by forkhead transcription factors and its perturbation by pathogenic mutations

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer.

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer

The Role of Forkhead Box Family in Bone Metabolism and Diseases

Structural Basis for DNA Recognition by FOXG1 and the Characterization of Disease-causing FOXG1 Mutations

Forkhead box proteins: tuning forks for transcriptional harmony

The Emerging Roles Of Fox Family Transcription Factors In Chromosome Replication, Organization, And Genome Stability

The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer

Dissecting multifunctional roles of forkhead box transcription factor D1 in cancers

Mechanistic Regulation of FOXO Transcription Factors in the Nucleus.

Advances in the Researches of the Biological Function of Transcription Factors FOXOs

Research Progress on the Role of FOXOs Family in Cancer

The Regulatory Roles and Mechanisms of the Transcription Factor FOXF2 in Human Diseases

FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates

The forkhead-box family of transcription factors: key molecular players in colorectal cancer pathogenesis

Structure of the Forkhead Domain of FOXP2 Bound to DNA

FOXK Transcription Factors: Regulation and Critical Role in Cancer

FOXM1: Functional Roles of FOXM1 in Non-Malignant Diseases

Mechanism of forkhead transcription factors binding to a novel palindromic DNA site

Dynamic FoxO transcription factors

The functions of FOXP transcription factors and their regulation by post-translational modifications