Abstract:Background Forkhead box, class O (FoxO) belongs to the large family of forkhead transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved forkhead box DNA-binding domain. To date, the FoxO group has four mammalian members: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, which are orthologs of DAF16, an insulin-responsive transcription factor involved in regulating longevity of worms and flies. The degree of homology between these four members is high, especially in the forkhead domain, which contains the DNA-binding interface. Yet, mouse FoxO knockouts have revealed that each FoxO gene has its unique role in the physiological process. Whether the functional divergences are primarily due to adaptive selection pressure or relaxed selective constraint remains an open question. As such, this study aims to address the evolutionary mode of FoxO, which may lead to the functional divergence. Results Sequence similarity searches have performed in genome and scaffold data to identify homologues of FoxO in vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis was used to characterize the family evolutionary history by identifying two duplications early in vertebrate evolution. To determine the mode of evolution in vertebrates, we performed a rigorous statistical analysis with FoxO gene sequences, including relative rate ratio tests, branch-specific d N / d S ratio tests, site-specific d N / d S ratio tests, branch-site d N / d S ratio tests and clade level amino acid conservation/variation patterns analysis. Our results suggest that FoxO is constrained by strong purifying selection except four sites in FoxO6, which have undergone positive Darwinian selection. The functional divergence in this family is best explained by either relaxed purifying selection or positive selection. Conclusion We present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the FoxO gene family and show that the genes have evolved through duplications followed by purifying selection except for four sites in FoxO6 fixed by positive selection lie mostly within the non-conserved optimal PKB motif in the C-terminal part. Relaxed selection may play important roles in the process of functional differentiation evolved through gene duplications as well.

Regulation of the FoxO transcriptional activity and the affection to meat quality

Transcriptomic Analysis of the Longissimus Thoracis Muscle in Pigs Has Identified Molecular Regulatory Patterns Associated with Meat Quality

The Role of Forkhead Box Family in Bone Metabolism and Diseases

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer

FOXN Transcription Factors: Regulation and Significant Role in Cancer.

FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates

The rules and regulatory mechanisms of FOXO3 on inflammation, metabolism, cell death and aging in hosts

The Essential Role of FoxO1 in the Regulation of Macrophage Function

The Tissue-Specific and Developmental Expression Patterns of the Forkhead Transcription Factor Foxo1 Gene in Pigs

Major Genes and Relevant Molecular Markers Effecting Lean Meat Percentage of Domestic Animals

Dynamic FoxO transcription factors

Current research progress of physiological functions of Foxc2

FoxO1 regulates muscle fiber-type specification and inhibits calcineurin signaling during C2C12 myoblast differentiation

The role of FOXO1-mediated autophagy in the regulation of bone formation

Role of forkhead box O1 in bone remodeling

Progress in Research of FOXO Proteins in Tumorigenesis

Nutritional regulation of skeletal muscle energy metabolism, lipid accumulation and meat quality in pigs

Applications of Post-Translational Modifications of FoxO Family Proteins in Biological Functions.

FoxO family members in cancer

Foxp1/2/4 regulate endochondral ossification as a suppresser complex.

FOXM1: Functional Roles of FOXM1 in Non-Malignant Diseases