Abstract:There has been a large literature in the last two decades affirming adaptive DNA sequence evolution between species. The main lines of evidence are from (i) the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test, which compares divergence and polymorphism data, and (ii) the phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) test, which analyzes multispecies divergence data. Here, we apply these two tests concurrently to genomic data of Drosophila and Arabidopsis. To our surprise, the >100 genes identified by the two tests do not overlap beyond random expectation. Because the non-concordance could be due to low powers leading to high false negatives, we merge every 20-30 genes into a 'supergene'. At the supergene level, the power of detection is large but the calls still do not overlap. We rule out methodological reasons for the non-concordance. In particular, extensive simulations fail to find scenarios whereby positive selection can only be detected by either MK or PAML, but not both. Since molecular evolution is governed by positive and negative selection concurrently, a fundamental assumption for estimating one of these (say, positive selection) is that the other is constant. However, in a broad survey of primates, birds, Drosophila and Arabidopsis, we found that negative selection rarely stays constant for long in evolution. As a consequence, the variation in negative selection is often misconstrued as a signal of positive selection. In conclusion, MK, PAML and any method that examines genomic sequence evolution has to explicitly address the variation in negative selection before estimating positive selection. In a companion study, we propose a possible path forward in two stages-first, by mapping out the changes in negative selection and then using this map to estimate positive selection. For now, the large literature on positive selection between species has to await reassessment. The total evidence for natural selection at the DNA level in the last two decades is suspect.

Adaptive Genic Evolution in the Drosophila Genomes

genomesDrosophilaAdaptive genic evolution in the

Rate and cost of adaptation in the Drosophila Genome

Recombination Yet Inefficient Selection Along The Drosophila Melanogaster Subgroup'S Fourth Chromosome

Pervasive adaptation of gene expression in Drosophila

Genomewide architecture of adaptation in experimentally evolved Drosophila characterized by widespread pleiotropy

Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila

Two Decades of Suspect Evidence for Adaptive Molecular Evolution-Negative Selection Confounding Positive-Selection Signals

Evolution of Alternative Splicing in Newly Evolved Genes of Drosophila.

The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

A Genomic Map of the Effects of Linked Selection in Drosophila

Strong Purifying Selection at Synonymous Sites in D. melanogaster

Evolutionary Insights from a Large-Scale Survey of Population-Genomic Variation

The asexual genome of Drosophila

Evidence of a high rate of selective sweeps in African Drosophila melanogaster

New comparative genomic evidence supporting the proteomic diversification role of A-to-I RNA editing in insects

On the Origin of New Genes in Drosophila.

Adaptation of A-to-I RNA Editing in Drosophila

A Population Genetics-Phylogenetics Approach to Inferring Natural Selection in Coding Sequences

Nucleotide Variation and Recombination along the Fourth Chromosome in Drosophila Simulans

Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change