Abstract:There has been a large literature in the last two decades affirming adaptive DNA sequence evolution between species. The main lines of evidence are from (i) the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test, which compares divergence and polymorphism data, and (ii) the phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) test, which analyzes multispecies divergence data. Here, we apply these two tests concurrently to genomic data of Drosophila and Arabidopsis. To our surprise, the >100 genes identified by the two tests do not overlap beyond random expectation. Because the non-concordance could be due to low powers leading to high false negatives, we merge every 20-30 genes into a 'supergene'. At the supergene level, the power of detection is large but the calls still do not overlap. We rule out methodological reasons for the non-concordance. In particular, extensive simulations fail to find scenarios whereby positive selection can only be detected by either MK or PAML, but not both. Since molecular evolution is governed by positive and negative selection concurrently, a fundamental assumption for estimating one of these (say, positive selection) is that the other is constant. However, in a broad survey of primates, birds, Drosophila and Arabidopsis, we found that negative selection rarely stays constant for long in evolution. As a consequence, the variation in negative selection is often misconstrued as a signal of positive selection. In conclusion, MK, PAML and any method that examines genomic sequence evolution has to explicitly address the variation in negative selection before estimating positive selection. In a companion study, we propose a possible path forward in two stages-first, by mapping out the changes in negative selection and then using this map to estimate positive selection. For now, the large literature on positive selection between species has to await reassessment. The total evidence for natural selection at the DNA level in the last two decades is suspect.

Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila

Protein variation in Adh and Adh-related in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Linkage disequilibrium between single nucleotide polymorphisms and protein alleles

Adaptive Genic Evolution in the Drosophila Genomes

Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change

Functional olfactory evolution in <i>Drosophila</i> <i>suzukii</i> and the subgenus <i>Sophophora</i>

Rate and cost of adaptation in the Drosophila Genome

Conflicting signals of adaptive molecular evolution - Where does the neutral theory stand after 50 years?

Partial characterization and evolution of Adh-Adhr in Drosophila dunni

On the evolutionary relationships of Drosophila melanogaster

Skepticism toward adaptive signals in DNA sequence comparisons - Is the neutral theory dead yet?

The molecular evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase-related genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Selection and methionine accumulation in the fat body protein 2 gene (FBP2), a duplicate of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene

Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Pervasive adaptation of gene expression in Drosophila

Two Decades of Suspect Evidence for Adaptive Molecular Evolution-Negative Selection Confounding Positive-Selection Signals

From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta’s Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?

Evolution of Alternative Splicing in Newly Evolved Genes of Drosophila.

The effectiveness of selection in a species affects the direction of amino acid frequency evolution

Isolation and characterization of the genomic region from Drosophila kuntzei containing the Adh and Adhr genes

Adaptation of A-to-I RNA Editing in Drosophila