Abstract:There has been a large literature in the last two decades affirming adaptive DNA sequence evolution between species. The main lines of evidence are from (i) the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test, which compares divergence and polymorphism data, and (ii) the phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) test, which analyzes multispecies divergence data. Here, we apply these two tests concurrently to genomic data of Drosophila and Arabidopsis. To our surprise, the >100 genes identified by the two tests do not overlap beyond random expectation. Because the non-concordance could be due to low powers leading to high false negatives, we merge every 20-30 genes into a 'supergene'. At the supergene level, the power of detection is large but the calls still do not overlap. We rule out methodological reasons for the non-concordance. In particular, extensive simulations fail to find scenarios whereby positive selection can only be detected by either MK or PAML, but not both. Since molecular evolution is governed by positive and negative selection concurrently, a fundamental assumption for estimating one of these (say, positive selection) is that the other is constant. However, in a broad survey of primates, birds, Drosophila and Arabidopsis, we found that negative selection rarely stays constant for long in evolution. As a consequence, the variation in negative selection is often misconstrued as a signal of positive selection. In conclusion, MK, PAML and any method that examines genomic sequence evolution has to explicitly address the variation in negative selection before estimating positive selection. In a companion study, we propose a possible path forward in two stages-first, by mapping out the changes in negative selection and then using this map to estimate positive selection. For now, the large literature on positive selection between species has to await reassessment. The total evidence for natural selection at the DNA level in the last two decades is suspect.

Evolutionary Insights from a Large-Scale Survey of Population-Genomic Variation

The Genome-wide Signature of Short-term Temporal Selection

Evolutionary Genomics of a Subdivided Species

Population Genomics of Daphnia Pulex

Evolutionary Genomics of Sister Species Differing in Effective Population Sizes and Recombination Rates

Extensive standing genetic variation from a small number of founders enables rapid adaptation in Daphnia

A Population Genetics-Phylogenetics Approach to Inferring Natural Selection in Coding Sequences

Genomic analyses of population structure reveal metabolism as a primary driver of local adaptation in Daphnia pulex

Adaptive Genic Evolution in the Drosophila Genomes

Two Decades of Suspect Evidence for Adaptive Molecular Evolution-Negative Selection Confounding Positive-Selection Signals

Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila

Genetic Diversity, Heteroplasmy, and Recombination in Mitochondrial Genomes Ofdaphnia Pulex,daphnia Pulicaria, Anddaphnia Obtusa

The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations

The Recombinational Landscape in Daphnia pulex

Pervasive adaptation of gene expression in Drosophila

Genetic draft, selective interference, and population genetics of rapid adaptation

A Genomic Map of the Effects of Linked Selection in Drosophila

Genomewide architecture of adaptation in experimentally evolved Drosophila characterized by widespread pleiotropy

Fine-scale Genetic Analysis of Daphnia Host Populations Infected by Two Virulent Parasites – Strong Fluctuations in Clonal Structure at Small Temporal and Spatial Scales

Population Genetics of Rare Variants and Complex Diseases

Global Landscape of Recent Inferred Darwinian Selection for Homo Sapiens.