Abstract:There has been a large literature in the last two decades affirming adaptive DNA sequence evolution between species. The main lines of evidence are from (i) the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test, which compares divergence and polymorphism data, and (ii) the phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML) test, which analyzes multispecies divergence data. Here, we apply these two tests concurrently to genomic data of Drosophila and Arabidopsis. To our surprise, the >100 genes identified by the two tests do not overlap beyond random expectation. Because the non-concordance could be due to low powers leading to high false negatives, we merge every 20-30 genes into a 'supergene'. At the supergene level, the power of detection is large but the calls still do not overlap. We rule out methodological reasons for the non-concordance. In particular, extensive simulations fail to find scenarios whereby positive selection can only be detected by either MK or PAML, but not both. Since molecular evolution is governed by positive and negative selection concurrently, a fundamental assumption for estimating one of these (say, positive selection) is that the other is constant. However, in a broad survey of primates, birds, Drosophila and Arabidopsis, we found that negative selection rarely stays constant for long in evolution. As a consequence, the variation in negative selection is often misconstrued as a signal of positive selection. In conclusion, MK, PAML and any method that examines genomic sequence evolution has to explicitly address the variation in negative selection before estimating positive selection. In a companion study, we propose a possible path forward in two stages-first, by mapping out the changes in negative selection and then using this map to estimate positive selection. For now, the large literature on positive selection between species has to await reassessment. The total evidence for natural selection at the DNA level in the last two decades is suspect.

Evidence of a high rate of selective sweeps in African Drosophila melanogaster

Geographical delimitation of a partial selective sweep in African Drosophila melanogaster

Elevated Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Soft Sweeps Are Common in Drosophila melanogaster

Molecular variation of Adh and P6 genes in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster and its relation to chromosomal inversions.

Adaptive Genic Evolution in the Drosophila Genomes

Population genomics of sub-Saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture

Recombination Yet Inefficient Selection Along The Drosophila Melanogaster Subgroup'S Fourth Chromosome

A Genomic Map of the Effects of Linked Selection in Drosophila

Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species

Recent Selective Sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster Show Signatures of Soft Sweeps

The impacts of positive selection on genomic variation in Drosophila serrata: Insights from a deep learning approach

Strong Purifying Selection at Synonymous Sites in D. melanogaster

Nucleotide Variation and Recombination along the Fourth Chromosome in Drosophila Simulans

Standing genetic variation and chromosome differences drove rapid ecotype formation in a major malaria mosquito

Estimating the Parameters of Background Selection and Selective Sweeps in Drosophila in the Presence of Gene Conversion.

Selection of p53 pathway in adaptive evolution and reproductive isolation in incipient sympatric speciation of Drosophila at Evolution Canyon

Two Decades of Suspect Evidence for Adaptive Molecular Evolution-Negative Selection Confounding Positive-Selection Signals

Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data

On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: Examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and viruses

Inference of selective sweep parameters through supervised learning

Rapid Evolution of Male Reproductive Genes in the Descent of Man