Abstract:We study the voting game where agents' preferences are endogenously decided by the information they receive, and they can collaborate in a group. We show that strategic voting behaviors have a positive impact on leading to the ``correct'' decision, outperforming the common non-strategic behavior of informative voting and sincere voting. Our results give merit to strategic voting for making good decisions. To this end, we investigate a natural model, where voters' preferences between two alternatives depend on a discrete state variable that is not directly observable. Each voter receives a private signal that is correlated with the state variable. We reveal a surprising equilibrium between a strategy profile being a strong equilibrium and leading to the decision favored by the majority of agents conditioned on them knowing the ground truth (referred to as the informed majority decision): as the size of the vote goes to infinity, every $\varepsilon$-strong Bayes Nash Equilibrium with $\varepsilon$ converging to $0$ formed by strategic agents leads to the informed majority decision with probability converging to $1$. On the other hand, we show that informative voting leads to the informed majority decision only under unbiased instances, and sincere voting leads to the informed majority decision only when it also forms an equilibrium.

The Welfare Consequences of Strategic Voting in Two Commonly Used Parliamentary Agendas

The welfare consequences of strategic behaviour under approval and plurality voting

B e ha v ioural heterogeneit y un d er appro va land plurality voting

The Borda rule is also intended for dishonest men

Strategic Voting and the Degree of Path-Dependence

A Welfarist Critique of Social Choice Theory: Interpersonal Comparisons in the Theory of Voting

The Wisdom of Strategic Voting

Sequential Agenda Setting with Strategic and Informative Voting

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Epistemic Selection of Costly Alternatives: The Case of Participatory Budgeting

Average-Case Analysis of Iterative Voting

Temporal Elections: Welfare, Strategyproofness, and Proportionality

Behavioral Heterogeneity Under Approval And Plurality Voting

Modeling Peoples Voting Behavior with Poll Information

Bayesian Vote Manipulation: Optimal Strategies and Impact on Welfare

Efficient equilibria in common interest voting games

Rational voting behaviour accounting for heterogeneous ballots in British elections

Should Politicians be Informed? Targeted Benefits and Heterogeneous Voters

Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting

A Farewell to IIA